"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly
Parent Rule has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be
held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State grants
Rights
Responsibilities Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.
Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that
the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the State, not
the Natural Parents the Protector of
the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Special Prosecutor.
Svend's
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Free Speech.
"THE leading family judge in England reinforced
the traditional view of marriage yesterday as he rejected an attempt by
two lesbians to have their Canadian wedding legalised in Britain.
.. Celia Kitzinger and Sue Wilkinson lost their High Court fight
to be recognised in law as a married couple. .. The British
couple used human rights laws to argue that the union should have full
legal status under English law. But Sir Mark Potter, President of the
Family Division of the High Court, also cited human rights legislation
in dismissing their application. .. He ruled that “to accord
a same-sex relationship the title and status of marriage would be to fly
in the face of the European Convention on Human Rights as well as fail
to recognise physical reality”. .. The
university professors,
who married while working in Vancouver in 2003, said that they were
“deeply disappointed by the judgment” and claimed that it perpetuated
discrimination." NOTE: Another example of Lesbians their
exercising the Courts to gain favorable precedents with NO STATUTORY
BASIS. Note also exchange of lawyers between the countries.
The UK Courts shouldn't allow Canadian Law or a Canadian Lawyer
presenting Canadian arguments in a UK Court. They should
immediately consider the possibility of trying for Treason anyone
pushing Canadian Law into UK Courts.
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
Goudreault's behaviour,
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
Childhood
Sexual abuse is a recurring theme. We take extreme issue with
Religious Training which obligates
sexual abuse victims to "Forgive" their Perps before the Truth is told
and the Perp repents. Quashing a victims' report often results in
Displaced Aggression, perhaps murder.
Absent
father is the most highly correlated background factor found in
homosexuals, both male and female. Absent Father is a
developmental, NON-genetic factor. If homosexuality were genetic
there should be NO correlation with developmental factors, and
these factors should show Statistical Independence. They don't.
Also highly correlated to homosexual males is the "Lastborn Male" (of
several
children)
factor, a clearly NON-genetic factor, and suggestive of fatherly
neglect. Female Serial Killers may be of the Lesbian variety, or
the "Black
Widow" type. For some reason, many women applaud the "Grey
Widow" type, which we believe would not be possible without the
gross negligence and Femi-Narcissism of Courts in Division of Assets and
it's concurrent violence to Inheritance provisions for children of a
previous marriage.
1.
Money (74%)
2. Control (13%)
3. Enjoyment (11%)
4. Sex (10%)
5. Drugs, Cult involvement, cover up, or feelings of inadequacy
(24%)
From
Female Serial Killers
Darrel
should be able to sue Justice Southin PERSONALLY for DAMAGES, but will
that ever happen? All members of the Law Societies have sworn
their First Allegiance to their Society members.
"The CCP is the darling of powerful
liberal-left special interest groups who are used to getting their way
if they make enough noise -- notably feminists, gay-rights activists and
aboriginals. .. The CCP may be funded by Canadian taxpayers,
but it has been taken over by the very special interest groups that are
its major beneficiaries. Aided by their ideological supporters in the
academic and legal communities, these "rights-seeking" advocacy
organizations use the program to fund court cases whose goal is a
radical interpretation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. ..
Most of the time, when such cases get to court, these left-leaning
government-funded organizations are opposed by traditionalist or
right-of-centre groups who receive no tax dollars to cover their legal
expenses.
"Please all watch May 15, & May
16, 2006 then give CBC feedback
liaison@cbc.ca or
cbcinput@cbc.ca. ... This
documentary is regarding CAS and it's power. As this story unfolds
exposing the Durham Children's Aid Society and the nightmare that
has rocked a kinship family it will carefully relate the gut
wrenching detailed story of the "Abuse of CAS's power" and a system
that is not held accountable by anyone. This show will reveal
the over drugging, and sexual abuse of a young boy, J while in the
"care" of the Durham CAS. ... As well
CBC will show how CAS covered up of the abuse, and the grandparents
$60,000.oo fight to get J out of the hands of the CAS. Plus many
more heartbreaking events concerning the Durham Children's Aid
Society located in Oshawa, Ontario. The dates are as follows for the
airing:
Monday May 15, 2006 and
Tuesday May 16, 2006 at 6:00 PM. LOCAL CBC Television as well as
Radio with 3 1/2 to five minute segments.
Tuesday May 16, 2006 at
10:00 PM with Peter Mansbridge on the National News about a 22
minutes time frame.
There are no words to describe
the suffering and the trauma that these children and grandparents
have endured." Thanks, Betty
"I receive death threats and abuse on a regular
basis. My address and phone number have been placed on the Internet by
gay militants and people told to harass and assault me. Jokes were made
when my father died, insults made about my family. ..I have been told by
editors and publishers that I will never work as a writer in various
places because I defend marriage. But I will not react in kind and I
will not surrender. I do, however, want people to know that there is
hatred at work."
www.EqualCustodyAct.com;
Dr. Mark Klein:
"Equal
Custody Act is a federal act Dr. Klein would propose which would give
equal rights to moms AND dads in custody cases. Currently men's civil
rights for the most part are being ignored in family courts. Dr. Klein
is currently in the "testing the waters" phase of a bid for the
presidency of the United States of America. Dr. Klein's key plank on his
platform is the Equal Custody Act. The Equal Custody Act will restore
civil rights to dads as the Civil Rights Act restored equal rights for
African Americans in the 1960's."
"Unfortunately,
disparate, decontextualized and
sometimes illegitimate findings can be easily cited and are often
employed to back up fallacious claims. Even cases of "scientific
studies"…demonstrate serious inconsistencies and indicate the enigmatic
nature of empirical research which is so often treated as "objective""
Dear
Members,
We have great news. There is a joint physical care bill that has
taken us completely by surprise. SF507 just passed out of the Senate
Judiciary committee and is now on its way to the Senate Floor. Below
is a copy of the bill that is exactly what we have been working for.
Since HF22 was passed into law (2004) we have been watching the
court rulings. What we have found is that most judges approved of
the law but a small few ignored it. One of them was Judge Pelton and
as you know we took action against him. The second thing we found is
that most judges do not find existing cases to qualify for joint
physical care. They claim that the bill is not considered a change
of circumstance; well the legislators appear to disagree with the
courts. SF507 will give every parent the right to request JPC, in
addition make it very difficult for the courts to deny it. This is a
very important bill and it needs your help for it to have a chance
to become law this year......
Senate
File 507
"Section 1. Section 598.41,
subsection 5, paragraph a, Code 2007, is amended to read as follows:
a. If joint legal
custody is awarded to both parents, the court may award joint
physical care to both joint custodial parents upon the request of
either parent during the proceedings on the initial dissolution
petition or during the proceedings on a modification of the original
custody border. A
rebuttable presumption exists that a request for
joint physical care by either parent is in the best interest of the
child, the burden of proof to rebut the presumption rests on the
party denying that joint physical care is in the best interest of
the child, and such party shall demonstrate that joint physical care
is not in the best interest of the child by clear and convincing
evidence. If the
court finds by clear and convincing evidence that joint physical
care is not in the best interest of the child and denies the request
for joint physical care, the determination shall be accompanied by
specific findings of fact and conclusions of law that the awarding
of joint physical care is not in the best interest of the child. In
determining the best interest of the child relative to the denial of
a request for joint physical care, the court shall consider that the
best interest of the child includes the opportunity for maximum
continuous physical and emotional contact possible with both
parents, unless direct physical or significant emotional harm to the
child may result from this contact.
Existing Legislation: Iowa Code 2003: Section 598.41;
"1. a. The court, insofar as is reasonable
and in the best interest of the child, shall order the custody
award, including liberal visitation rights where appropriate, which
will assure the child the opportunity for the maximum continuing
physical and emotional contact with both parents after the parents
have separated or dissolved the marriage, and which will encourage
parents to share the rights and responsibilities of raising the
child unless direct physical harm or significant emotional harm to
the child, other children, or a parent is likely to result from such
contact with one parent. ... "
Iowa's Bill HF22, Presumption of Joint Physical
Custody
"If joint legal custody is awarded
to both parents, the court may award joint physical care....
If the court denies the request for joint physical care, the
determination shall be accompanied by specific findings of fact and
conclusions of law that the awarding of joint physical care is not
in the best interest of the child. b. If
joint physical care is not awarded under paragraph "a", and only one
joint custodial parent is awarded physical care, the parent
responsible for providing physical care shall support the other
parent's relationship with the child. Physical care awarded to one
parent does not affect the other parent's rights and
responsibilities as a joint legal custodian of the child.
Rights and responsibilities as joint legal custodian of the child
include, but are not limited to, equal participation in decisions
affecting the child's legal status, medical care, education,
extracurricular activities, and religious instruction."
Judge David Orr on Protection of Pedophiles in
Newfoundland's Public Service, Complainants go to Waterford Psych Hospital
"a video on Catholic Irish
Christian Brothers and their sexual abuse of children
the unholy alliance and partnership of Newfoundland's
corrupt 50 years as the government responsible for those
children's care."
2009-04-30 Law societies under fire, Kate Lunau -
Google Search; Recall the Courts and the Law
Societies are the creation of an Act of Parliament,
cannot be supreme over Parliament, and can be dissolved
or replaced by an Act of Parliament. Some Acts of
Parliament provide certain professional Societies
SELF REGULATION. These include the Law,
Medical & Engineering professions. It is our
contention that the Law Societies have singularly
Failed to Perform their obligatory function to
Self-Regulate, Self-Discipline, and maintain our
Supremacy of Parliament. The Law
Societies have instead
moved
into Judicial
Tyranny and
Judicial
Treason. We maintain that the
Self Regulation of Law Societies, and in particular
the autonomy of the Judiciary must end, being replaced
by external Regulation by other Professional regulatory
bodies, formed from the other self-regulating
professions: Medical and Engineering, until this
generation of corrupt Judges & Lawyers have been brought
to Justice and properly dislodged and incarcerated.
A
well-known physician in St. John's is losing
his licence for having sex with a patient.
At a closed-door hearing Tuesday, the
College of Physicians and Surgeons of
Newfoundland and Labrador found
Psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Cantwell guilty
of professional misconduct. The
college said
he
had sexual relations with a patient between
2004 and 2008. Cantwell spent many
years responsible for mental health and
addictions at the
Waterford Hospital, an institution
specializing in psychiatric care, before
withdrawing from practice last year.
The college ordered Cantwell to surrender
his medical licence and pay a portion of the
costs of Tuesday's disciplinary hearing. The
college also has to publish a summary of its
findings. Lawyers for Cantwell and the
female patient have written an agreed
statement of facts. That statement has not
been released to the public.
Shane
Earle
- When
Bishop Raymond Lahey was charged last week with possessing
and importing
child
pornography, it was a shock to nearly everyone. But not
Shane Earle. He was among the boys who were sexually abused
at the Mount Cashel orphanage in Newfoundland in the 1980s. And
he says he told investigators then that he saw pornography at
Bishop Raymond Lahey's home.
(More ...)
Contact The Current, CBC 877-287-7366
Note
that Shane Earle was sent to the local St. John's Psychiatric Hospital -
which we presume to be the
Waterford where
Byron Prior
is being held a Political Prisoner - and drugged so
he can "handle" the experience of seeing the Priest's Man-Boy porn and
condoms. His memory is no longer what he would like it to be.
Because of the head games
Post
Traumatic Stress plays on your memory and psychic integrity, we
encourage all those traumatized to REJECT DRUGS
and get into a good UNPAID talk-based
PEER-COUNSELING "recovery": program.
YOU
DON"T HAVE TO FORGIVE!!!!
Note:
Bishop Raymond Lahey is from St. John's NFLD, and will be
part of the Pedophile establishment there. To bad
for him he wasn't arrested in BC here where the
Judges are lining up to protect Child Pornographers
and
Teacher-Student Sex
Brian Gerrish discusses Common
Purpose its connections with freemasonry and the
implications in family courts controlled by
masonic
judges.
Thousands of families everyday are being
stripped bare and children removed to care homes by a
small cabal of self appointed judicial monsters
"Some
of the men victimized at Newfoundland's infamous
Mount Cashel orphanage say they feel like they are
being forced to let the provincial government off the
hook in exchange for a settlement. .. A
total of 85 men are entitled to receive compensation
from the Christian Brothers of Ireland. But first they
must sign an agreement that they won't sue the province
of Newfoundland and Labrador. .. Almost
every one of the 85 men now set to get compensation from
the bankruptcy of the
Christian Brothers has trouble trusting people. Many
are in jail, many have had trouble with alcohol and
drugs. Now an Ontario court will decide how $16 million
will be divided among them. And it's a tangled web.
Wayne Pittman, one of the abuse victims, is entitled
to compensation from the Christian Brothers.
But Pittman says he wants more than money.
"It's about the truth, it's about
justice, it's about closure, it's about moving on with
my life. But primarily the truth has to be put forward
before I can do that."
Pittman spoke out Monday at a hearing to determine who
will receive the assets. He's furious that
an estimated $16-million fund for victims will be hinged
on those same victims signing away the
right to sue the provincial government. ..
The province paid out $11 million in 1996 to Mount
Cashel victims, and
it's claiming the right to take that
money back from anybody who wins compensation from the
Christian Brothers and refuses to sign a document
promising not to launch future lawsuits.
Government lawyer
Don Burrage says taxpayers have already put the $11
million towards this compensation and that has to count.
.. The competing interests will fight it out in an
Ontario court over the next two weeks, and one of the
things the court will look at are contingency fees of
between 20 and 40 per cent that the lawyers are charging
the victims. .. Caught in the centre of this
battle over money and how it will be
distributed
are the 85 men who may never again be whole. .. "
The the lawyer
scamming (representing) ~80% of the Mt.
Cashel Victims is was the now Premier
Danny Williams.
More From the desk of Wayne Pittman:
"The gist of it all is, they
rigged the
Hughes Inquiry, the police reinvestigation, and the
Mount Cashel civil claims process to the hilt. And in
the end no charges of
obstruction of justice were ever laid against any of
the perpetrators of the cover-up of Mount Cashel. The
official reason for that, said then
Justice Minister Paul Dicks, himself a former
Christian Brother, was because he’d been advised “at
all levels” that “willful intent” was difficult to
prove, and that, in any event, there wasn’t “enough
evidence available to bring any of the perpetrators to
court.” ... .
Whenever the stink from what they get themselves up to
with respect to our resources and/or our rights gets too
much for the Newfoundland public to put up with all at
once, and we then complain about it profusely, a public
inquiry is then commissioned, with all of the powers
granted to it under the
Public Inquiries Act, to go out and suck up all of
the relevant documents from the public record. Once they
have all of that together, and have considered and
perused it ad nausiem, they write up a terms of
reference, which they already know the answers to, then
issue it to the puppets they’ve selected, and tell the
people they can’t comment on any of the transactions of
the commission of inquiry until after the puppets they
selected to conduct it submit their report, which they
then say will require six months or so of study, before
they release the report to the public and enact any
recommendations that they deem wise and in the best
interests of the public to enact.
"The commission then holds a farce of an
inquiry, from which the most important documents are
withheld (such as was the case with my documents in
1989-90), and a “somewhat believable” though totally
false and confusing version of events is put forth,
which leaves the public scratching and shaking their
heads, wondering what to make of it all. ...
The biggest problem with it all is, the
vast majority of the Canadian public have absolutely no
idea what’s actually going on."
"Newfoundland is
also infamous for its indifference to one
of its most precious resources; its orphaned, unwanted
foster children.
Childhood sexual abuse has long been
rampant and continues to receive justice’s blind eye.
... Not only sex abuse of children but an
elitist attitude allowing misery upon misery to be
heaped upon children of a physical and psychological
nature by religious people, teachers, social
workers and in general professional people,
a different kind of JUSTICE.
According to
Byron Prior,
Danny Williams is the Lawyer that
supervised the Mount Cashel investigations, required the
Boys of Mount
Cashel
sign off on all Claims against the Province of
Newfoundland for ignoring the boy's appeals for help,
and pocketed the vast majority of the Award for Damages
for his law firm.
A Newfoundland Supreme Court justice in St. John's has ruled
that a libel-related section of the Criminal Code of Canada is
unconstitutional, and contravenes the Charter of Rights and
Freedoms. At issue in the decision, rendered Friday and
publicly released on Monday by Justice Lois Hoegg, is whether
the Crown can prove that a subject knows potentially libelous
statements to be false.
Byron Prior had
been charged with three counts of publishing a defamatory libel,
under
Section 301 of the Criminal Code. Prior
claimed a public justice official had raped his sister and made
her pregnant in 1966. However, a decision released Monday
by Hoegg says that Prior's sister told police she didn't know
the official — who is not named in the decision — and had not
been raped.
Prior made his allegations in flyers and on a placard that he
wore in public, the decision notes. Subsequent to the court
proceedings, he has also posted videos on the internet about his
claims.
Prior's lawyers, Derek Hogan and Sean Montague, argued that
Section 301 of the Criminal Code contravenes the Charter of
Rights.
Hoegg agreed.
"I find that it is not justified, in our free and democratic
society, for the Crown to use the heavy hammer of the criminal
law against a subject for publishing defamatory libel when the
Crown is not able to show that that subject knows that his
statements are false," Hoegg wrote.
"As the case law aptly establishes, the expression of truthful,
unpopular or even false statements deserve protection unless
expressed in a violent manner."
Section 301 states: "Everyone who publishes a defamatory libel
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment
for a term not exceeding two years."
Hoegg noted that the Crown had not charged Prior under Section
300, which holds that a person "who publishes a defamatory libel
that he knows is false is guilty of an indictable offence and
liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years."
"Presumably, if the Crown felt it could prove Mr. Prior
knowingly published defamatory libel, it would have charged him
under Section 300," she wrote in her decision.
An official with the provincial Justice Department said the
Crown is now considering an appeal of Hoegg's decision.
Corruption in Government, Lot's of explaining
to do <in Newfoundland>
Ministry of Attorney General in Newfoundland and Labrador
seem to have very strange priorities. They are throwing in jail
Ed Byrne, a former leader of the Progressive Conservative
party and a senior government minister, who has admitted to
defrauding taxpayers but at the same time they find it perfectly
OK that former Justice Minister, in Newfoundland government and
former Chief Justice of Supreme Court of Newfoundland
T. Alex Hickman raped and impregnated 12 years old girl
Susan Prior.
It is not only that Newfoundland Crown refuses to prosecute
Hickman for his crimes but they also went out of their way to
prosecute Byron Prior, older brother of Susan Prior, who for
last 40 years was trying to alert RCMP and the public about
abuse he and siblings suffered at the hands of Hickman and his
friends. Justice David Orr who presides over Byron Prior's trial
on accusation of defamatory libel finds perfectly OK to force
Mr. Prior into psychiatric evaluation but at the same time
denies Mr. Prior's simple request that Alex Hickman submits
himself to DNA testing to determine who is the father of his
sister's daughter??
Ed Byrne, who pleaded guilty in January to two fraud-related
charges, should serve a term in jail of less than two years,
Frances Knickle said during a sentencing hearing in provincial
court in St. John's. Judge Mark Pike is scheduled to bring down
his sentence on April 17.
There are 30 cases listed most of them are relevant.
Harvey, re, 1991 CanLII 3962 (NL L.S.) —
1991-04-29
Law Society of
Newfoundland and Labrador — Newfoundland
and Labrador
member's trust account
— trust account in the name — complaint
— guilty of professional misconduct —
shortage
Byron
Prior was before Judge David Orr without the benefit of a Jury.
Although six mental health
professionals in an out-of-province Assessment had described him as suffering from post-tramatic
stress, and NOT delusional, Judge Orr sent Byron from the Courtroom to
Newfoundland's Waterford Hospital where his wife
Dr. Dena Orr treats patients. The
Waterford is also
where the sexually abused boys from the
Mount Cashel Orphanage
were sent from time to time.
Mount Cashel provided
the storyline for the
"Boys of St. Vincent" Biopic.
Byron says he protested his being assessed by
his Judges' wife, but
Dr. Dena Orr insisted her professionalism was sufficient to
permit her to assess Byron.
Assessment, of course
determines a patients treatment, medications, and the Conditions
of Release.
Sexual psychopath. His
'data' mostly came from sexual psychopaths, sex offenders,
criminals, pedophiles, male prostitutes, and promiscuous
homosexuals. Two of his "co-investigators" were serial
rapists:
Rex King, convicted of 800 counts of child rape involving
both sexes, and
Fritz von Balluseck, an ex-Nazi convicted of the rape-murder
of a ten-year-old girl in Berlin
Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad,
to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for
his alleged data on normal "child sexuality."
".... she was wrapping up a self-funded
documentary that "named names" and exposed a very high-level,
child-pedophile ring.
That's enough to get anyone killed."
Former
Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce have died from
a single shot wound each.
Nancy
was shot once in the back while she lay sleeping. Her husband
Bruce was shot once in the chest.
Both shots were
lethal.
Two shots, Two Kills
The deaths are being handled as
a 'murder-suicide'. More likely Bruce was shot
in the chest while confronting the Shooter having been woken by
the the shot that killed Nancy.
If you don't want to go nuts in the Family Law Industry, you'd
better prepare yourself to recognize
Peck's previously
undescribed psychological class of what he calls "Evil" people.
"M. Scott Peck, M.D. <Psychiatrist> wrote a most important book for
our times,
People of the Lie, The Hope For Healing Human Evil, published in
1983 by Simon & Schuster. It’s a study of human evil. Peck said he
chose the title “because lying is both a cause and a
manifestation of evil. It is partly by their lying that we recognize
the evil.”
Peck’s analysis of the Mylai massacre, its massive cover-up and the
deceptions made by our government in the Viet Nam war should not be
missed for its lessons for us today."
"In spite of credible revelations dating
back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual
sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin
allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him
to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age
of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the
world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne
McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of
consent to 16
"In Ontario
alone, the names
Cornwall, Prescott,
and London became
synonymous with
"respectable" pedophile
rings -- lawyers, doctors, police officers
and
Catholic clergymen -- that for decades
preyed on society's most vulnerable
boys."
Former
Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce have died from
a single shot wound each. The deaths are being handled as
'murder-suicide'. Apparently the husband shot her in the back
and then himself in the chest.
This is a Judge practicing his sexual orientation for decades while
on the BC Bench.
It is inconceivable that the Law Enforcement
officers and other Judges were unaware of all his activities.
Law Enforcement Officers, are of course unable to act without the
support of the Judiciary.
Aleister Crowley instructed his followers to practice
Homosexual
Pedophilia and Pederasty to sustain and increase their Spiritual Powers
by thieving the life force of their Victims.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative 
