"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that
the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the State, not
the Natural Parents the Protector of
the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Special Prosecutor.
Svend's
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Free Speech.
Even France has rejected Homo-marriage (preferring
France's homosexuals to emigrate to Canada?!). International societies
of Women Judges & Lawyers appear to have designated Canada as the
globe's Homosexual habitat of choice:
Meijers Latest news about globalizing Homo-Marriage & Homo-Parenting;
Coming up: 26-29 June 2005, Toronto, Canada, the conference of the
International Lesbian and Gay Law Association (ILGLaw),
Fabian Society, Communitarian
"Wolves in Sheep's' Clothing"
Globalizing National Socialism (Nazism) since 1884
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
Goudreault's behaviour,
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
Darrel
should be able to sue Justice Southin PERSONALLY for DAMAGES, but will
that ever happen? All members of the Law Societies have sworn
their First Allegiance to their Society members.
"A woman accused of killing her infant
daughter by cutting off the girl's arms had said a few days
earlier that she wanted to "give the baby to God," her husband
testified Tuesday.
Dena Schlosser, 37, was leaving church about a week before the
girl's November 2004 death when she said she wanted to give
Maggie to pastor Doyle Davidson, John Schlosser said.
"She said, 'I want to give the baby to Doyle.' She said 'I want
to give the baby to God,"' said Schlosser, who has filed for
divorce.
He also testified at his wife's murder trial that she showed
other disturbing behavior following Maggie's birth — including
cutting her own wrists with scissors — but that he didn't worry
too much or take her to counseling. John Schlosser said she had
had bouts with depression after the birth of their other two
daughters.
The testimony came on the second day of Dena Schlosser's murder
trial, which hinges on whether she knew right from wrong.
Prosecutors are not seeking the death penalty.
The defense has entered a plea of not guilty by reason of
insanity.
Dena Schlosser was arrested in 2004 after she told a 911
operator she had severed her baby's arms. Police found Schlosser
in the living room, covered in blood, still holding a knife.
On Monday, she slumped forward and stared at her hands as
prosecutors played jurors the recording of the 911 call.
"Exactly what happened?" 911 operator Steve Edwards asked.
"I cut her arms off," Schlosser replied as a gospel song played
in the background.
After her arrest, Schlosser was diagnosed with manic depression.
In February 2005, a jury deliberated only a few minutes before
deciding Schlosser was mentally incompetent to stand trial and
she was committed to North Texas State Hospital. But in May, a
judge decided Schlosser was competent.
Her two surviving daughters, ages 6 and 9, are in their father's
custody.
Schlosser had been accused of child neglect in the months before
Margaret's death, but a state investigation found she did not
pose a risk to the 10-month-old or her other two daughters.
Texas' troubled Child Protective Services came under intense
scrutiny after a number of high-profile child abuse deaths,
including the Schlosser case.
The Health and Human Services Commission, which oversees CPS,
laid out more than 160 recommendations last year to overhaul the
agency.
Insanity ruling for mother that dismembered newborn baby &
ate it's brain
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative 
