"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that
the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the State, not
the Natural Parents the Protector of
the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Special Prosecutor.
Svend's
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Free Speech.
Even France has rejected Homo-marriage (preferring
France's homosexuals to emigrate to Canada?!). International societies
of Women Judges & Lawyers appear to have designated Canada as the
globe's Homosexual habitat of choice:
Meijers Latest news about globalizing Homo-Marriage & Homo-Parenting;
Coming up: 26-29 June 2005, Toronto, Canada, the conference of the
International Lesbian and Gay Law Association (ILGLaw),
Fabian Society, Communitarian
"Wolves in Sheep's' Clothing"
Globalizing National Socialism (Nazism) since 1884
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
Goudreault's behaviour,
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
Darrel
should be able to sue Justice Southin PERSONALLY for DAMAGES, but will
that ever happen? All members of the Law Societies have sworn
their First Allegiance to their Society members.
Plastination, as it was called was an adaptation of
contemporary
microtoming and
embalming practice which incorporated new German plastics in
solution in place of the conventional
paraffin and embalming fluids for replacing cellular
contents with stable materials. Numerous bodies were
preserved during those years including the Plastinators
mistress, which GBR pictured naked, lounging on his sofa
where she remained forever available to him..
The most dramatic of the bodies pictured by
GBR was the
"Horse & Rider" which is either exhibited or has been
re-created by Von Hagen.
1937 -
Polyurethanes tradenamed Igamid for plastics materials
and Perlon for fibers. -
Otto Bayer and co-workers discovered and patented the
chemistry of polyurethanes
The creator of a popular museum exhibit of
preserved human bodies has removed his father as boss of a new
corpse preparation factory in Poland after revelations of the
father's Nazi past.
"Body Worlds," a traveling exhibit
currently at the Museum of Science and Industry, has attracted
175,000 people here since it opened in February and won rave
reviews.
But in Europe, Gunther von Hagens, the
German physician who created the technique in which corpses are
injected with plastic resin, has received some negative press
from critics claiming the exhibit ranges from disrespectful to
monstrous. The harshest criticism has likened von Hagens to
Josef Mengele, the Nazi doctor who conducted experiments ...
Wall Street & the Rise of Hitler,
Anthony C Sutton
Exhibit of Dead Bodies Having Sex Stirs Up Controversy
The "Cycles of Life" exhibit featuring real
human corpses posed in real sexual positions opened in Zurich
this week and -- surprise! -- it shocked a lot of people.
Artist Gunther von Hagens, the German sculptor behind such
brilliant works as dead bodies headbutting soccer balls and dead
bodies playing saxophones, is no stranger to controversy. His
2006 Body World show in New York drew ire when it was revealed
that many of the bodies came from undocumented Chinese workers.
According to von Hagens, the fornicating couple in his new
"Cycles of Life" exhibit volunteered before death to be used in
the sex exhibition. When they died, they were stripped of their
water and fats and injected with plastic before being posed in a
sexual position. The couple had never met in life,
suggesting that first dates get way better in the afterlife.
A controversial Science Museum exhibit of human
cadavers has caused some to raise questions about death and
respect for the dead.
Josephine Marcotty, Star Tribune
PHILADELPHIA -It was almost like being in
church.
Even teenagers were hushed by the sight of
the skinless bodies displayed like sculptures in Philadelphia's
cavernous Franklin Institute.
A leaping man with his backbone dangling
behind him. An 8-month fetus curled up inside the reclining
figure of its mother. A brain darkened by Alzheimer's disease.
"That is cra-a-a-zee," the teens whispered as
they walked past one extraordinary specimen after another.
This is Body Worlds, an exhibit created by
German anatomist Gunther von Hagens that opens Friday for a
four-month run at the Science Museum of Minnesota. The
plastic-infused cadavers present for public viewing what had
been the exclusive purview of doctors and medical students --a
glimpse of what lies beneath the skin, in breathtaking detail.
The exhibit, von Hagens says, is "the
democratization of anatomy."
Magnet for controversy
But his creations have been a magnet for
controversy, including questions about whether he acquired all
of the bodies ethically. Some critics revile his work as
desecration of the human body and accuse him of using cadavers
as art. In Europe, von Hagens has been called "Dr. Death." His
harshest critics compare him to Josef Mengele, the Nazi
scientist concentration- camp victims called "the Angel of
Death."
Nevertheless, his exhibits --three Body
Worlds are now traveling the globe --are hugely popular in
Europe and the United States. At the end of their runs in Los
Angeles and Chicago, crowds were so large that museums kept
their doors open 24 hours a day. And there are now eight copycat
shows.
The appeal of Body Worlds, many say, goes
beyond anatomy. The figures' lifelike poses are like mirror
images of the people who gaze at them, von Hagens said. "The
body talks to them" he said in a telephone interview, adding, "I
close the distance between life and death."
Donated their bodies
The figures, about two dozen in all, are all
deceased people who donated their bodies to von Hagens.
Minnesota Science
Museum
officials made certain of that by sending an attorney to check
the death certificates against the donor documentation at von
Hagen's plastination center in Heidelberg, Germany. Other
museums have done the same thing since the California Science
Center hosted the first Body Worlds exhibit in 2004.
The pregnant woman and fetus were a
particular concern, said Michael Day, a senior vice president
for the science museum.
"We wanted to make sure it was her baby," he
said. The donors are all anonymous, a legal and ethical
requirement for virtually all scientific body donations. But because reaction to
the pregnant woman is so intense, it is the only plastinate
figure for which Body Worlds provides background information.
She became pregnant after she was diagnosed
with a fatal illness. Neither she nor her fetus survived,
according to information provided at the exhibit in
Philadelphia. "Her husband transported her body to Heidelberg,"
Day said.
The figures are preserved through a process
von Hagens invented in the 1970s called plastination. The
cadavers are embalmed, then the water in their bodies is
replaced with plastic, a painstaking process. The end result is
"spectacular," said Anthony Weinhaus, an assistant professor of
physiology at the University of Minnesota. "I'm staggered by the
opportunity to see anatomy in that detail."
Yet for many the exhibit is unsettling.
"These were once real human beings, flesh of our flesh, bone of
our bones," said Paul Wojda,
an associate professor of theology at the
University of St. Thomas, and a member of the science museum's
advisory committee for Body Worlds. "Is a proper respect being
displayed here? And quite honestly, reasonable people are going
to come to different conclusions."
They certainly did in Europe --especially in
Germany, where memories of the human experiments at Nazi
concentration camps have not subsided. When the show opened
there in the mid-1990s, leaders of the Jewish Congregation of
Berlin compared Von Hagens' work to the Nazi atrocity of turning
victims' skin into lamp shades. Munich officials banned him from
their city in 2003.
In the United States, von Hagens' exhibits
have drawn intense media coverage, some of it critical, but no
public protests. Von Hagens said he understands why history has
made his work controversial in his home country. Germans "are
very sensitive to corpses and the human body," he said. "When
Germans hear 'corpse,' they think of concentration camps."
But he does not object to the controversy
--in fact, he courts it. He sent his figures on a bus through
the streets of Berlin and posed them in coffee shops. In London,
he defied authorities and conducted an autopsy before a paying
audience at an art gallery. But he has vigorously denied
allegations that he acquires cadavers unethically or illegally.
That included claims that surfaced two years ago that he has
used bodies of executed Chinese prisoners. German prosecutors
investigated and found he had done nothing illegal. von Hagens
also won a legal injunction against Der Spiegel, the German
magazine that first published some of the allegations.
No shortage of donors
He has also denied reports linking his
plastination facility to a scandal involving a forensics
official in Novosibirsk, Russia, who was convicted of illegally
providing bodies to a medical facility. Prosecutors questioned
whether some of the bodies were destined for von Hagen's
plastination lab, but he was never accused of wrongdoing. He was
also cleared by German prosecutors in a similar investigation
involving bodies from Kyrgestan.
Von Hagens has no shortage of donors. About
6,800 people have signed their bodies over to him since 1982, he
said; 350 of them have died and had their wishes fulfilled.
Minnesotans will have the opportunity to sign up for his
donation program this week when the exhibit opens at the (
Science Museum.
"It is highly dignifying to fulfill the wish
of people to become body donors," von Hagens said, "and to
plastinate according to their will."
Josephine Marcotty .612-673-7394
Gunther von Hagens' "Body Works"
Hitler orders Pyramid Preps refitted with new
German plastics
Plastination, as it was called was an adaptation of
contemporary
microtoming and
embalming practice which incorporated new German plastics in
solution in place of the conventional
paraffin and embalming fluids for replacing cellular
contents with stable materials. Numerous bodies were
preserved during those years including the Plastinators
mistress, which GBR pictured naked, lounging on his sofa
where she remained forever available to him..
The most dramatic of the bodies pictured by
GBR was the
"Horse & Rider" which is either exhibited or has been
re-created by Von Hagen.
To prove the case against Barbi, they "followed the money".
Where did the cash flow originate? The Vatican Bank!!!
This was reported during the Barbie Trial in papers ~1982, with pictures of the Cardinals and Vatican Officials
shown. Then, it appears, the story was pulled.
“because lying is both a cause and a
manifestation of evil. It is partly by their lying that we recognize
the evil.”
If you don't want to go nuts in the Family Law Industry, you'd
better prepare yourself to recognize
Peck's previously
undescribed psychological class of what he calls "Evil" people.
"Though many therapists and law enforcement persons are aware of
organized sexual abuse of children in BC, this is the first book
that attempts to document the extensiveness of the abuse and the
breadth of the corruption in our province."
-
Garry Flint, Ph.D., Registered Psychologist.
Aleister Crowley wrote a
brief letter to Ian Fleming, now the Director of Naval Intelligence,
offering his help.
Sir:
If it is true that Herr Hess is
much influenced by astrology and Magick, my services might be of use to
the Department in case he should not be willing to do what you wish. I
have the honour to be, Sir,
European Union: Brainchild of
the Failing Nazi Conquest
Early on, the EU "stars" were Occult Goathead symbols you see
here. When this
writer pointed this out to my mother, she explained that the stars are
all "flying" to the Tower of Babylon. She also said that the
European Union would "never happen" because "Everybody
knows it's just a bunch of Old Nazis trying to take over Europe again".
Since that time, the EU has flipped them to
the more acceptable US form. They can be just as easily flipped back
to the Goathead form in the future.
For another outcome of Nazi interest in the Occult - the revisiting of
Egyptian preparation into the Afterlife with new German plastics,
see News: von Hagens, Gunther:
"Body Works
Blavatsky identified the Masonic Lodges as being a natural vehicle by
which Luciferianism could be spread around the world. She received
the Masonic Rite of Adoption in
1877, the year she published.
Isis Unveiled.
Blavatsky and Lucifer / Lucis
Publishing appear to have been in dialogue with
Westcott & Hort during their malicious
elimination of about 15% of the
Textus Receptus (used for Bible Translation) and declaring Lucifer
to be "Christ" through mutual equivalence with
"Morning Star"
Clyde Hertzman wants to know everything he can about about
your family and children. He and his
Human Early Learning Partnerships program has been
successful in subverting our privacy laws to legalize his
collection, analysis, and reporting of your family's
personal information to global policy makers.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.