"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and
pernicious heart of darkness that has developed in our court
system, being the use of FALSE ACCUSATIONS
in civil justice. This is the mischief of litigating parties,
usually mothers, suddenly within the context of divorce and
within child custody proceedings falsely accusing the other
party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,, These FALSE ALLEGATIONS
are often made with the overt or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of
children and creating fatherlessness."
EPA
Meetings
are now managed using the Meetup meeting and messaging tools.
Leave a Note at: Equal
Parenting-BC if you wish, with your phone number or Skype ID
and we will try to call you to get you into a Group near you.
Spouses welcome at "Open Meetings", but NCPs only at
"Closed Meetings", please.
With
our buddies at the
Human Rights Tribunal and the Courts we have with NO
STATUTORY BASIS established that
HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS trump
NATURAL PARENTS' RIGHTS.
By
exercising the Courts in Homosexualist Doctrine, the outcome of
any contest between a homosexual "Legal Parent" wannabe and the
"Natural Parent" has been predetermined, because
we have now established that "NATURAL PARENTS HAVE NO
RIGHTS".Our demands for
Homosexual Marriage is now purging from Canadian Statute the
term "Natural Parent", displacing it with the term "Legal
Parent".
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigngs
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war
Nazi Germany. Under the British system rights are
not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform" McLellan
warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody... and
perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Clyde Hertzman wants to know everything he can about about
your family and children. He and his
Human Early Learning Partnerships program has been
successful in subverting our privacy laws to legalize his
collection, analysis, and reporting of your family's
personal information to global policy makers.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they
will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges are
Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only
observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly
Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws
and customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was
done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary
across the land, into a unified body of Laws. The
Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of
Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Arnie Hein is embarking on a cross-Canada cycle to raise
awareness regarding the Father being stripped of
the family by the Family Court System. He is seeking fairness.
" I
want my kids back, at least half the time. I want this law that
removes children from their fathers - and fathers from their
children -to change. I am cycling across Canada to raise
awareness of this problem.
I need other fathers to know they are not alone. I want to unify
the men and children abused by this Family Court System. It is
important that the general public becomes aware of this problem.
"
These poor creatures are brutally raped on the
wedding night and kept as marital sex slaves for years. I am no
longer surprised; I say, "So what?" This is the
norm in the Middle East and Northern Africa.
"Sadly, the English,
tumbling into the Islamic inferno as they are, do not have the
political will to stop the practice because that would mean
deporting all Muslims from their soil.
The problem is not that a few pedophilic psychopaths are doing
this, but rather that it is encouraged and accepted by entire
communities of immigrants who hail from the most barbaric and
backward areas on this planet"
"EDUCATION:
United Church Academy, Grand Bank; Memorial
University, St. John’s, Newfoundland; Dalhousie
University, Nova Scotia – Graduated from Dalhousie Law
School with the Degree of LL.B., May 13, 1947."
"LEGAL
EXPERIENCE: Called to the
Bar of Nova Scotia November 7, 1947, and to the Bar of
Newfoundland April 7, 1948. Practiced Law in St. John’s, Newfoundland,
with the firm of
Barron, Lewis and Hickman from April 2, 1948, to March
31, 1953; Practiced as a senior partner with the firm of Halley, Hickman
and Hunt,
St.
John’s except during periods of absence when he was a Minister of the
Crown, from August 1966 to July 1979. Created
Queen’s Counsel May 1964 – Bencher Law Society of
Newfoundland 2957 to 1966 and Honourary Secretary – Law
Society
of Newfoundland 1960 – 1966; Vice-President – Canadian Bar Association
1959 – 1961;
was
a Member – International Association Insurance Counsel; Fellow American
College of Probate Counsel; Appointed to the Supreme Court of
Newfoundland as Chief Justice of the Trial Division of that Court on
December 9, 1979. Director Canadian Institute for the Administration of
Justice
1980
– 1984. Active as a Judge with Jessup International Moot Court 1980 –
2001."
"Danny, you talk a lot about Stephen
Harper lying, come to Ottawa and tell
the whole truth about your legal system
in NL as I'm doing. ... I'll stop
telling the truth about your legal
system when I die and not before...
Check out the NEW RCMP REPORTS page on
my web site. A DNA test that's it, The
WHOLE TRUTH in one stop, to easy for
you.http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse"
"Butterfly Kisses"
- a Lesbian euphemism for indoor sports:
"Butterfly Kisses" Jr. Baby Doll T-Shirt "...a
great gift for your 'Daddy's Little Girl' ...
"designed to fit juniors, fits snug, sizes run small...."
a great gift for the girls you are "mentoring" at the
YWCA.
Conspiracy of Silence - Illuminati
Pedophiles in Washington D.C. - Google
Search;
From Senator John Decamp: In mid-1993,
after The Franklin Cover-Up had been
circulating for almost a year, the
British-based TV station, Yorkshire
Television, sent a top-notch team to
Nebraska to launch its own investigation of
the Franklin case. Yorkshire had a contract
with the Discovery Channel to produce a
documentary on the case for American
television. Finally, the big day came. Their
documentary was to air nation-wide on the
Discovery Channel on May 3, 1994. It was
advertised in the TV Guide and in newspapers
for that day. But no one ever saw that
program. At the last minute, and without
explanation, it was pulled from the air. It
was not shown then, and has never been
broadcast anywhere since. I have a copy of
that program, which arrived anonymously in
my mail in late 1995. When I watched this
pirated copy, I could see clearly why the
program had been suppressed. Conspiracy of
Silence proved, beyond doubt, that the
essential points I had stressed in the book
(and more) were all true.
"Twenty years
after sexually attacking
Liz Seccuro while both were
students at the
University of Virginia in
Charlottesville,
William Beebe -- a recovering
alcoholic who had wrestled for years
with whether making amends would
further injure
Seccuro-- sent her
a letter of apology. Via e-mail, the
Associated Press reported, Beebe
acknowledged to
Seccurothat he had
raped her.
She responded by contacting
authorities in Charlottesville and
in Las Vegas, where Beebe lived.
Beebe was arrested. In spite of his
e-mail confession, <his
lawyer>
denied the rape, but eventually he
pled guilty to a lesser charge of
aggravated sexual battery. The plea
is believed to be in exchange for
Beebe's cooperation with an
investigation of others involved in
the attack. Sentencing is scheduled
for March 15.
Dateline asks the following
question, which demand, we think, the
following answers.
Was Beebe
right, after 20 years, to contact
Seccuro to apologize?
YES!!!!!
Or did his
effort to
make amends lead to greater harm?
NO!!! It was the beginning of
her Vindication, and
a quantum leap in her Recovery
Was
Seccuro right to press charges
after so long and in the face of obvious
remorse?
Yes, to prove (i.e.. Test
/ Exercise / Strengthen)
Beebe's Repentance.
Is it possible
to forgive and to demand justice at the
same time?". No,
Forgiving IS Forgetting.
Forgiveness IS Reconciliation.
Meanwhile the Victim can - and probably
should - pursue Vindication and
extend or withdraw
GRACE (unmerited favour) until the
Fruits of Repentance are born by the
Offender (eg.
Luke 3:7-14 ) Once Vindicated and
Recompensed, the Victim can - and
probably should - Forgive,
"seventy times seven". (eg
Luke 17:3-4 and
Matt 18:21-35 )
Their offices are often
called "Ministry of..", "Justice Center",
etc.. The
Femi-Narcissist varieties will be called
"Women's ???" or "??? of
Women".
In reality they are
ANTI-Ministries, and governments who wish to
achieve the goals they claim to pursue will
DE-TAX Canadians, and DE-FUND the
Anti-Ministries, and FUND THE
FAMILY directly in hard assets rather than
funding these ANTI-Services.
"Imagine - if you can - not having a
conscience, none at all, no feelings of
guilt or remorse no matter what you do, no
limiting sense of concern for the well-being
of strangers, friends, or even family
members. Imagine no struggles with shame,
not a single one in your whole life, no
matter what kind of selfish, lazy, harmful,
or immoral action you had taken. ..
And pretend that the concept of
responsibility is unknown to you, except as
a burden others seem to accept without
question, like gullible fools. ..
Now add to this strange fantasy the ability
to conceal from other people that your
psychological makeup is radically different
from theirs. Since everyone simply assumes
that conscience is universal among human
beings, hiding the fact that you are
conscience-free is nearly effortless.
.. You are not held back from any of
your desires by guilt or shame, and you are
never confronted by others for your
cold-bloodedness. The ice water in your
veins is so bizarre, so completely outside
of their personal experience, that they
seldom even guess at your condition.
.. In other words, you are completely
free of internal restraints, and your
unhampered liberty to do just as you please,
with no pangs of conscience, is conveniently
invisible to the world. .. You
can do anything at all, and still your
strange advantage over the majority of
people, who are kept in line by their
consciences will most likely remain
undiscovered."
The Psychopath: The Mask of Sanity
Psychology term describing an individual,
usually a child or teen, in a dysfunctional
family who:
Gets scapegoated and blamed for a
family's problems
Has emotional problems that are not a
mental illness, but a normal response to
the stress of dealing with an unhealthy
family in denial
Blows the whistle on a dysfunctional
family's problems
Phrase originated because family
therapists recognized that the child
"identified" as the patient is not
necessarily the one who is sick.
John is dropping out
of school and doing drugs and his
parents want him institutionalized, but
it turns out his mother is an abusive
alcoholic and his father is chronically
absent. John is the identified patient
Becky is extremely
depressed and fearful. She accuses her
father <typically this is the STEP
father, or STEP brother>, correctly, of
molestation, but the parents deny it and
accuse Becky of being sick for reasons
that have nothing to do with them. Becky
is the identified patient.
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized
lives of families living with a protected
Pedophile and
the mental illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim
keeps the Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public
Servant.)
2005-06-21 Memory, Pain and the Truth: A
leading psychologist long skeptical about
'repressed' recollections challenged a much-cited
sex abuse claim. Scorn and litigation ensued.
This article demonstrates a "Jane Doe" who in adulthood
had forgotten her mothers' sexually abusing her
until she was shown a tape of herself as a child
reporting her mother's molesting her.
NOTE: Sexually abused children often discard
(forget) unacknowledged painful events to maintain
sanity
and
emotionally survive while living with their Abuser.
In adulthood, memories may erupt spontaneously
decades later, triggered by some seemingly trivial
event evoking the discarded memory. These are the
true "recovered memories". An
extraordinary injustice was done when Psychologist
"professionals" began searching for these memories
in their clients using hypnotism, promptings and
suggestion, seeking for a "memory" to "recover".
This led to a plethora of false accusations against
men, and gave rise to discounting all "Recovered
Memories" as "Recovered
Memory Syndrome".
Psychologist Elizabeth F. Loftus
sought to expose the feminazi witch hunt against falsely
accused men, but appears to have inadvertently
strengthened the legal defense of true Pedophiles
and prompting true victims to continue their
suffering in silence once again. See
also:
breakingthesilence.com; and
June 13, 2005 / Matthew MacDonald,
hiddenfromhistory.org.
Copyright 2002 equalparenting-bc.ca
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
