●  EP-BC Home   ● About  Issues  Testimonials News  Reference  Fun Stuff Members


Reference Area Home

Divorce Act (Canada)

Commonwealth References

Common Law

Canadian Statutes

Canadian Statutes
Divorce Act, CA
Charter of Rights

Provincial Statutes

BC Statutes

Federal Court Decisions

CA Case Law, SCC

Provincial Court Decisions

1999-11-15_SCBC_BerryVBerry
Power Struggles, BC
Case "Law"
Senft v. Senft
Date
BC Case Law
Hildinger v. Carroll
1992-11-16_ bcsc_Laba-V-Laba.html
Northcott-V-Northcott_BCSC
Woodland v. Ceeco
Young v. Young
























Court Watch

Canadian Children's Rights Council

lawyers-bc.com

Colman, Gene C - Family Law Centre, Toronto

DUHAIME LAW Reference, Victoria

Queen's Printer

Residential Tenancy Branch

 Highbeam Research

BC Electronic Law Library

  Search FACT  

   lawyers.ca

Family Law, UBC Law Students Legal Advice

Family Mediation, Canadian Bar Association


History of Law

Fundamental Justice

Common Law

Divine Right of Kings

Cromwell & British Parliamentary System

Constitutional Monarchy

British North Am. Act

Breach of Trust

Judicial Branch

 

BC Case Law

  New British Columbia Reference URL to ADD.


Mother is in contempt when not fulfilling terms of a Parenting Agreement, WA. Filed October 2, 2003

http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.opindisp&docid=723664MAJ

ALEXANDER, C.J.--Christopher Rideout initiated a contempt proceeding in superior court against his former wife, Sara Rideout. In it he alleged that Sara demonstrated a pattern of interference with visitation time with their children to which Christopher was entitled pursuant to a court-approved parenting plan and a subsequent court order establishing a summer visitation schedule. After a hearing, the superior court held Sara in contempt for what it concluded was her 'bad faith' failure to comply with the terms of the court order relating to summer visitation. Sara obtained review of that decision by the Court of Appeals, Division Two, which affirmed the superior court's contempt order. Sara thereafter petitioned for review by this court and we granted her petition. In re Marriage of Rideout, 147 Wn.2d 1008 (2002). 

We affirm the Court of Appeals, holding that: (1) notwithstanding the fact that the submissions at the contempt proceeding were entirely documentary, the superior court's findings of fact should be given deference and evaluated to determine if there was substantial evidence to support them, and (2) a parent who is the primary residential custodian may be held in contempt, pursuant to RCW 26.09.160, for failure to make reasonable efforts to require a child to visit the other parent as required by a parenting plan and a court order establishing visitation.

Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII, Case Law Reference)

Joel Millar's Family Law Center Examples

Continuing Legal Education-BC Login Page

BC Provincial Court Judgement Database

 


Joint custody

Taker v Taker (BC supreme court) the parties agreed on joint custody and was working for 2 years, they had a scene and communication broke down. Mother applied for sole custody, judge dismissed the appeal.

Olusanya v Olusanya (bc supreme court) - parents agreed to joint custody - mother applied to vary it - judge ruled "...those friction points would not appear to be ones that would be substantially overcome by ending joint custody and awarding sole custody to the petitioner"

Frydrysek v frydrysek BCSC 1999) bitter custody dispute & other matters.... judge ruled ..."I doubt if Mr & Ms will ever be able to consult with one another in a meaningful, let alone civil, way with respect to Mishko(the son). Usually, such a finding would automatically preclude parents being granted joint custody of a child. In this case, however, I find there should be an order that Mr & Ms share joint custody of Mishko."

Wells v Watson (BCSC 2000) J. Collver ruled " In spite of increasing rancor which has plagued the parties' relationship before and after their separation, I ordered continuation of joint custody & guardianship."


 

Copyright 2002  equalparenting-bc.ca 

 

   Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages  exercising democratic rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.