●  EP-BC Home   ● About  Issues  Testimonials News  Reference  Fun Stuff Members


Reference Area Home

Divorce Act (Canada)

Up
BC Judiciary

Commonwealth References

Canadian Statutes

Canadian Statutes
Divorce Act, CA
Charter of Rights

Provincial Statutes

BC Statutes

Federal Court Decisions

CA Case Law, SCC

Provincial Court Decisions

1999-11-15_SCBC_BerryVBerry
Power Struggles, BC
Case "Law"
Senft v. Senft
Date
BC Case Law
Hildinger v. Carroll
1992-11-16_ bcsc_Laba-V-Laba.html
Northcott-V-Northcott_BCSC
Woodland v. Ceeco
Young v. Young
SK Case Law
























Court Watch

Canadian Children's Rights Council

lawyers-bc.com

Colman, Gene C - Family Law Centre, Toronto

DUHAIME LAW Reference, Victoria

Queen's Printer

Residential Tenancy Branch

 Highbeam Research

BC Electronic Law Library

  Search FACT  

   lawyers.ca

Family Law, UBC Law Students Legal Advice

Family Mediation, Canadian Bar Association


History of Law

Fundamental Justice

Common Law

Divine Right of Kings

Cromwell & British Parliamentary System

Constitutional Monarchy

British North Am. Act

Breach of Trust

Judicial Branch

 

Judicial Branch:

Add your New Reference Link here:  Reference URL to ADD


WARNING:  In the British Parliamentary System, which Canadians are fortunate to have inherited, PARLIAMENT IS SUPREME.  The Judiciary is a body created by and regulated by an Act of Parliament.  The Judiciary may not use their powers for purposes other than those set out in the Act, such as political purposes, without committing BREACH OF TRUST.

"Case Law" is NOT "law"!  Only Parliament and the Legislatures can create Law.  Judges create "Jurisprudence" by ruling on points not governed by Statute.  Since 1649 and the British Civil War, we have enjoyed the "Supremacy of Parliament" over King and Court..  Nevertheless, pretentious Judges and obsequious lawyers subvert these core democratic principals of our Parliamentary System, and call jurisprudence "Case Law".

For more.. Supremacy of Parliament Vs Activist Judges


A litigant who knowingly and intentionally misleads the court is not entitled to any relief from the court.

NEVILLE V. NEVILLE


A parent has the right to see his or her children ...

SIMPSON V. SIMPSON


Permanence of Agreements

2003-04-07  Miglin v. Miglin, [2003]

2003-Spring The Supreme Court of Canada: An Agreement is Likely A Final Agreement - Spousal Support Releases & The Miglin Decision

1998-07-02   Hildinger v. Carroll


Joint Custody is a means to alleviate Power Struggles:

Citation: Lindsey v. Lindsey, 2000 BCSC 1111
Date: 2000-07-18
Docket: F990279
URL: http://www.canlii.org/bc/cas/bcsc/2000/2000bcsc1111.html

"Another aspect of considering joint custody as a power sharing arrangement, is that where the Court does not feel that it can trust one of the two parents by virtue of their mutual animosity, joint custody has been seen as an option to neutralize the amount that one parent can dictate to the other. "


Terminology:

Nemo judex in parte sua

Latin and a fundamental principle of natural justice which states that no person can judge a case in which he or she is party. May also be called nemo judex in sua causa; or, nemo debet esse judex in propria causa.

Nonfeasance

Not doing something that a person should be doing. Compare with malfeasance and misfeasance.

Natural justice

A word used to refer to situations where audi alteram partem (the right to be heard) and nemo judex in parte sua (no person may judge their own case) apply. The principles of natural justice were derived from the Romans who believed that some legal principles were "natural" or self-evident and did not require a statutory basis. These two basic legal safeguards govern all decisions by judges or government officials when they take quasi-judicial or judicial decisions

 

Family Law Related Sites:

The Creation of the Provincial Courts by Statute of the Legislature: the BC PROVINCIAL COURT ACT

BC Provincial Court Judges by District

Federal and Provincial Jurisprudence

Continuing Legal Education Society, BC (CLE, Jurisprudence, BC One Month Free Subscription)

Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII, Case Reference)

Joel Millar's Family Law Center Examples

fathers.ca Case Law

Federal and Provincial Case Law

Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canada

BC Electronic Law Library

Canadian Legal Information Institute, CanLII

CanLII,  Advanced search

CanLII, Case Law Reference

CanLaw

DUHAIME LAW

Carey Linde, Vancouver

JP Boyd BC Family Law

Chipeur Advocates, Calgary

Quicklaw

Bora Laskin Law Library, University of Toronto

provincialcourt.bc.ca

familylawtoronto.ca

www.divorce-online.co.uk:  interesting Polling Results

National Center for Policy Analysis, US

MensDivorceCentre.org, Toronto, ON

International Family Law: A Selective Resource Guide

DivorceCalgary.com

Lawyer Joke Emporium

www.nolawyer.com

Canadian Lawyer Magazine

FAMILY LAW - CHILD SUPPORT - FATHER'S RIGHTS

Ontario Lawyer Law Times

www.canadacourtwatch.com

Virtual Human Rights Library

www.canadalawbook.ca

Law Society

http://www.duhaime.org/School/

Legal Services Society

BC Archives

BC Bulletins

MOAG: Reports & Publications

MOAG: Family Court Forms

MOAG: Alphabetical Listing of Statutes

Court Services: Do It Yourself Divorce

UBC Law Students' Legal Advice Program

BC Courthouse Library Society

BC Government Attorney General

BC Superior Courts Website

BC Vital Statistics

Department of Justice; Central Registry To Divorce Proceedings Unit

Family Law Case Conference  

Departmant of Justice

Legal Services Society, Family Law Web Site

Rules of Professional Conduct, Law Society of Upper Canada 

Ontario Courts

??? BC Family Law Handbook ???

Copyright 2002  equalparenting-bc.ca 

 

   Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages  exercising democratic rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.