"Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed
from a Natural Parent!!!
"Two Equal Parents may .. agree to unequal Parenting
Time, but this does NOT impugn the Parental Authority of either
Natural Parent relative to Third Party Interlopers.
1. The Bottom Layer: The Initial
Equal Parenting Agreement
Initial
Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time equality
of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a
Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of
tentative
Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or
"Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable
laid out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and
incorporated into the
Annual Parenting Supplement. Parental authority and
discretion is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of
Parenting Time allocations.
2. Middle Layer: The Annual
Supplement & its Parenting Timetable
3. Top Layer: Autonomy of Both Equal
Parents on all matters not previously Constrained.
Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions
between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no
third parties. Full autonomy of each parent during their
Parenting Time as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all
residual parenting questions not previously constrained by Covenants
in the initial Equal Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual
Parenting Supplement. Full discretion on residual parenting
with the Timetabled Parent, but flexibility encouraged and provided
by Ad Hoc Agreements.
"Trociuk
is .. a disheartening endorsement of biological concepts of
parenthood ... flawed .... it legitimizes a heterosexual view
of the family. .. It must be ignored."
This is a Judge practicing his sexual orientation
for decades while on the BC Bench. It is inconceivable that
the Law Enforcement officers and other Judges were unaware of all
his activities. Law Enforcement Officers, are of course unable
to act without the support of the Judiciary.
The university community tells us that at least
one of the Status of
Women university profs is not just
a run of the mill Communist... she's a self professed
MAOIST!!! The difference we're told is that a MAOIST
believes in
We say it is
Hedy Fry, and these
"Second Wave Feminists" /
Status of Women /
Women's Studies types that need to be eradicated from tax
funded positions and be forced to make Reparations to the thousands
of Fathers and their families whose lives who have been destroyed by
them since the sixties. We need also the restoration of the
Enticement &
Seduction provisions of Common Law which these SOWs had struck
by Statute.
...
No one would listen to my
father , no one would give him a chance to speak. ... My dad was an
abused husband, he was abused by his wife, and the justice system.
... He was a kind man who fought a good fight but no matter what he
did or said, he could never win with this system.
The common practice in BC Courts when Fathers do
not pay Child Support
- which most of the time is merely
Imputed - is to send
non-paying Father to Prison until he or his family members pay the
fees imposed by the Judge.
Even when mothers agree that Child Support should
no longer be paid, we find that the
Family Enforcement agencies, which are private contractors
functioning as
Bounty Hunters, typically refuse to end their claim on the
father's income,.
"Lohstroh, a 41-year-old
emergency-room doctor, was shot in the back Friday when he went to
pick up his two sons at their mother's home. Police say the
10-year-old boy climbed into the back of his father's sport utility
vehicle, fired a pistol several times through the back of the
driver's seat and then ran back inside the home."
"On August 9, and 10th, 2010,
Themis and the
Attorney General will be in the Supreme Court of BC in Vancouver
to defend their actions in violating the Privacy Act in
disseminating my Social Insurance Number without my
authorization.
"I believe this is the very first action in Canada against FMEP
for violations of privacy legislation and violation of the
Charter of Rights. It has taken five years to get them in front
of a judge, and this step is just one of many on their part to
avoid trial.
"Full trial is scheduled for nine days in October.It is definitely time that some light be shone on this
oppressive organization.
Sincerely, Robert Angus
Carol Rhodes: Whistleblower exposes the crooked child
support agencies
"Carol
Rhodes, former Friend of the Court Investigator ... recently did
an interview with host Richard Farr on the
KRights.com Internet Radio station. Michigan Shared parenting
activist
Robert Pedersen of
A Child’s Right was also interviewed. To listen, click
here.
The FMEP and the
Attorney General argued strongly that the wording of the FMEA
makes them exempt from the Privacy Acts.
EP-BC
I
think it is important to broadcast a bit of a summary of the
trial ASAP....
I think the strong representations by the
FMEP and the Attorney General
should open the floodgates against the administrative nightmare
called Themis. Their fundamental arguments for derailing my case
were that I had applied the law in the wrong way and that the
proper locale would have been to apply for Judicial Review. They
have always maintained in the past that their actions were not
subject to judicial review, but now, their actions have stated
unequivocally that both the
FMEPand the Attorney General feel that it is
right and proper to use Judicial Review in the case of a
dispute.
What
this means, is that everyone who is subject to the arbitrary
rulings of the FMEP can now apply for Judicial Review to correct
injustice. That means that if your
passport has been
removed you can appeal it. If the FMEP uses excessive activity
in collecting, you can appeal it. Similarly with driver's
licenses, excessive garnishment activity, broadcasting SINs or
other personal information.
The cost is nominal, approximately $300, and one can self
represent. It won't take very many cases to overwhelm the FMEP,
as they are already stretched to the limit in dealing with my
case.
Remember,
anything that you recall having been said in court my be used to
justify the Judicial Review. Only a few dozen cases
will force the FMEP to set up a proper appeal procedure.
In summary:
My view of the events of the last two days in Supreme Court:
Themis and the Attorney General
attempted to weaken my case which is scheduled for nine days in
October by bringing forth this 18A summary action to separate
the violation of privacy (SINs) from the removal of passports.
This would weaken my case.
There arguments were mainly that 18A was a proper venue, and
that my case should be dismissed as the proper appeal was a
Judicial Review which I had not applied for. Also, since I had
submitted documents to the Court with my SIN number on them that
I could have no expectation of Privacy. Also that in the opinion
of the Director of the
FMEP,
Chris Beresford, that including a SIN on a Notice of Attachment
was necessary in order to prevent garnisheeing funds from the
wrong person. Also, that as the Director of the
FMEP
was a knowledgeable person, that there was no higher authority
in determining what is meant by the word, "necessary". Also,
that I had suffered no harm from their activities.
Other junk was thrown in the mix to try and discredit me, such
as arrears. As this stuff had already been dealt with by another
court it was irrelevant and probably not admissible, but that
did not prevent the FMEP and
the Attorney General from slipping it in bit by bit.
All of these arguments were dealt with.
The
fundamental issues still are; Was the FMEP justified in sending
out my SIN to a dozen or more entities that did not previously
have it, and does this violate the Privacy Acts and is the FMEP
subject to these Acts?
The FMEP and the
Attorney General argued strongly that the wording of the FMEA
makes them exempt from the Privacy Acts.
The judge has reserved decision. She recognizes that this is a
very complex legal case and she estimates that it will take her
a month to review the material and render a decision.
Regardless, the FMEP and the Attorney General were badly clawed
by this experience. All it has cost me is time and money. Their
egos and power tripping are in jeopardy and they don't like it,
not one bit.
Ken, if you can find even one person to make a Judicial Review
application, I think it would help.
I suspect that even given the recent events, they will oppose it
which will completely expose their hypocrisy.
They
say it is their
"Policy" to NEVER return OVERPAYMENTS on Child Support.
They say it is their "Policy" or to NOT
acknowledge Payments to the Payee directly without going through
their Office, saying such payments are "Gifts" only,
and will NOT be considered by them to be payments of Child
Support. They say their "Policy" of removing
Passports and Drivers' Licenses, and spreading around your SINs
to strangers NOT involved in taxation is justified by the
"Greater Good"of defending a
Child's Right to receive
Support Payments. They claim Themis is a "Creation of Statute",
exercising only the powers given it by Parliament. See
Issues: Breach of
Trust of a Public Officer, Criminal
Themis operates as
Chris Beresford's
mercenary
Bounty Hunter.
We have known of Moms who, having seen what Themis has done to
Dad, have waived payment of Child Support to stop
Themis' attacks, but Themis has refused to stop.
Fathers'
rights activist
Stephen
Baskerville,
president of the
American Coalition for Fathers and
Children--describes why a child
needs its father’s presence and
discusses how our society is working
against the maintenance of the core
family structure
and how that can be changed.
(10/11/06);
Stephen Baskerville.ram Audio
(81:07)
Nearly
all divorces are initiated by
the woman. By complying
with the temptations provided by
the State, the State effectively
becomes her Husband.
Feminism has been the driving
force in the destruction of
Families, and has
effectively abolished Marriage
as a legal Contract
Morality is principally learned
from the Father, and is not well
learned in a single mother home.
overwhelmingly, the
most likely perpetrator of
physical abuse of children is
the single mother
overwhelmingly
the most likely
perpetrator of sexual abuse of
children is the unrelated male
in the household (whom we
affectingly call "Number Two")
Government apparatus created to
collect Child Support from lower
class fathers who have abandoned
the Children has been expanded
to hound middle class fathers
who have not abandoned their
children into poverty.
In
the nineteenth century when
fathers got automatic custody of
children, Divorce was very rare.
Courts must not continue to
operated in Secret but must be
investigated and exposed
Under the Clinton administration
children came to be used as
Weapons
"The Family
Courts are a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
The FMEP and the
Attorney General argued strongly that the wording of the FMEA
makes them exempt from the Privacy Acts.
Themis and the
Attorney General will .. defend their actions in violating the
Privacy Act in disseminating my Social Insurance Number without
my authorization.
"Themis
/ FMEP has reversed position:
They ARE subject to Judicial Review!!"
"..
everyone who is subject to the arbitrary rulings of the FMEP can
now apply for Judicial Review to correct injustice.
" .. anything that you recall having been said in court my
be used to justify the Judicial Review.
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war
Nazi Germany. Under the British system rights are
not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
The common practice in BC Courts when Fathers
do not pay Child Support -
which most of the time is merely
Imputed - is to send non-paying Father to Prison until he
or his family members pay the fees imposed by the Judge.
Even when mothers agree that Child Support
should no longer be paid, we find that the
Family Enforcement
agencies, which are private contractors functioning as
Bounty Hunters, typically refuse to end their claim on the
father's income,.
Affirmative Action has made White Heterosexual Anglophone Males (WHAMs) a Class
of employment ineligibility & PC Hatred since 1980
"I get government cheques..... you stupid
Canadians.. I get government cheques.", Korean Realtor
Canadian Affirmative Action programs coupled with massive
immigration from "non-traditional" sources to accommodate UN commitments
precluded white males and many white females from employment and progressive
employment in government offices.
These same White Males are now routinely subjected to
Imputed
Income by Family court Judges - the majority of whom are beneficiaries of
Affirmative Action programs - when Dad's incomes aren't as high as the Judge
expects them to be.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
More:
Fathers'
rights activist
