Testimonials Area Home
A Judge's Story Andrade, Franklin, Montreal Armstrong, Brian Bailey, Russell , RIP Brown, Arthur Carlin, Sara, RIP: Death by Anti-Depressant Cino, Sam Conway, Maurice Crockford Scott v RCMP Deadbeat Dad or Mum Dexel Mark Edward RIP Duplessis Orphans: Nazi Experiments England, Jonathan Vs Lesbian Lover Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel, NL Fleury , Theoren: Sexual Abuse Fredrickson, Rick RIP, Sask Gonis, Frank & Ashley Imputed Income Testimonials Jeffery, Hal & Danica Kempling, Dr. Chris Lohstroh, Rick, RIP: Mother Ass'd Patricide M Mabbot, Mel Manley, Perry, RIP: RIP: Suicide-by-Cop McLaughlin,Terry - RIP Millar, Wrongful Arrest Murtari, John Prejean, Carrie, Miss CA, "Tolerance... Prior, Byron: Sexual Abuse by Public Officer Renouf, Andy - RIP Samson, Pierre: Duplessis Orphans Sielski, Paul: Debtor’s Prison, Imputed Income Street, Wilbur - RIP Thornton: Womens' Threats Trociuk, Darrel - SCC White, Darren - RIP Wiebe, Ken v Status of Women Winkler, Matthew-RIP: Homicidal Moms Deadbeat Dad or Mum Fathers 4 Justice Fathers Thrown into Poverty MY LONG DISTANCE LIFE
|
Father
Suicide Directory








|
Hal
was a Widower and had a daughter, Danica, from a previous marriage.
He then had two children with a new wife who left him when they were
toddlers. (She was reported to have taken up with her Courtenay
lawyer.) When our BC Family Courts put Hal
through
it's torments of Imputed Income,
Gleaned Wages,
State Imposed Homelessness,
and
Debtor's Prison, they imposed these same torments on his
daughter Danica, then a Tween. Hal points out the Support Tables
assume the only children to support are the Payee's children.
You can see where that left Hal & Danica: homeless and
dependent on the kindnesses of neighbors.
More...
Imputed Income
Jeffery Hal's Testimonial;
Hall Jeffery's Danica Petition
|
"Desperate Husbands", by Stephen Perrine
2006-06-18 Keeping Divorced Dads at a Distance, Stephen
Perrine, Stephen Perrine, the editor in chief of
Best Life magazine, is
the author of the forthcoming "Desperate Husbands."(Thanks,
Paul Forseth)
EVERY other weekend for the past four and a half years, I've spent
three precious days with my two adolescent daughters. We play tennis
in summer, ski in winter, travel when the school schedule allows.
But no matter where we are, we're all keenly aware of the thin
membrane of secrecy that keeps us from being as close as we were
before their mom and I divorced. <Equal
Parenting eliminates this!!!>
Like most divorced fathers, I'm caught in
exactly the kind of nightmarish situation that experts on stress say
to avoid — a great deal of responsibility, but very little power.I'm
the major source of support for my children; my financial
obligations are set by the state, and my wages automatically
garnished. (If I lost my job tomorrow, and couldn't keep up with my
payments, a warrant for my arrest would be issued within two
months.) But my influence over how my daughters are being raised is
limited, sometimes by decisions their mother makes that I have no
input into, and sometimes by their allegiance to her when she and I
are at odds. ... They'll forget to tell me
some detail of their lives — or downright lie if they have to — so I
won't feel sad that I've missed something they shared with their
mom, or raise issue over some decision she's made with which I might
not agree. As a result, I sometimes come away from visits or phone
calls feeling shaken, saddened and angry. My ex and I
have been to court over support issues, and we've been to court over
custody issues, and the legal battles inevitably trap our children
in the middle and force them to choose sides. Sadly, this is exactly
what not to do if you want to foster a loving parent-child bond. In
a study by a child psychologist, ...
The first step toward fostering a father and child reunion is to
make private mediation of the parenting provisions (physical
custody, legal custody and visiting) the standard procedure.
Allowing parents the chance to negotiate their support — and
possibly give fathers more of a say in how their support is spent —
will decrease the vitriol, and let fathers feel more like parents,
not just paychecks.
Second, we need to enact and enforce
sensible penalties for interfering with visits. Jailing a mother
is no way to solve the dispute; neither are financial penalties
that hurt her ability to care for the child. But mediation —
perhaps compelled by the threat of financial penalty — might be
the solution. It's estimated that one in five children of
divorce has not seen his or her father in the past year. Without
substantial rethinking of our current support and custody law,
children will continue to be alienated from their fathers, and
lawyers will remain on hand to soak up the resulting legal fees.

Just this month, I received a summons to attend a custody
conference at the Allentown, Pa., courthouse, and another letter
informing me that an accounting error has left me short on
support payments, and that my passport may be suspended. I want
to shield my daughters from these harsh truths. So these are the
secrets I'll be trying to keep from them as we gather together
for Father's Day. What secrets will they be keeping from
me?
Stephen Perrine, the editor in chief of Best Life magazine, is
the author of the forthcoming "Desperate Husbands."
For more...
canadacourtwatch.com
|
| |
Deadbeat Dad or Mom?
In January, I was ordered to pay $752 a
month in Child Support starting on February.
Our most recent separation began about eight years ago when
the Children’s mother and I separated for the fourth and final time after her
fourth extramarital affair. When I left the family home, I had to completely
start over. All I took with me was my
desk, my schoolbooks, my clothes, my old computer and an old van that was
sabotaged by her boyfriend who put alcohol in my engine oil a few weeks later
(He also damaged, was charged and convicted of damaging the car I purchased to
replace the van). I also took all the
bills, one of which I finally managed to pay off in last spring and
one of which I am still paying off at $100 per month with approximately $2000
remaining.
The
separation began with the four children of the marriage living with their
mother and coming to stay with me on weekends in my almost empty one bedroom
apartment. After about a year and a half I managed to get a townhouse in a
nearby development. Then,
about a year later my eldest son, about eleven at the time, came crying to my
car saying he was not going back to that house again after being assaulted by his
mother’s boyfriend and being verbally attacked by his mother. Then,
that summer, the next oldest child, who was then then, and who has Autism,
refused to go back to his mother’s home after staying with me for the
summer. He said he did not want to
continue to endure his mother verbal abuse toward him (the abuses are
documented in a Court Ordered Home Assessment that the children’s mother and
her lawyer requested and then later argued to not be consider
by the court as the results were very negative toward her).
That left me with the two oldest children of the marriage
(which are more expensive to support and the
Children’s mother with the two youngest. We then negotiated a custody agreement. This agreement intentionally omitted child support, as we each agreed to
independently support the two children we had in our care. Things went well with the two children in
their mother's care coming to our home every second weekend as well as extra time
during school breaks and holidays. The two
children in my care were supposed to go to their mother's home on the alternate
weekends so that the four children could spend every weekend together. However, over time my oldest son decided to
no longer go to his mother’s home and the second oldest goes to the his mother’s
home only occasionally.
During the years since our separation, I endeavored to
improve my education and thus my employability. Being a person with a permanent disability (from a motorcycle accident when I was sixteen) and then becoming a
single parent I did not want to remain on social assistance for the rest of my
life. So I went to university, fitting my class schedule into my children's
school schedule as best I could and finding contracts or part-time work that
also fit and collecting social assistance or Employment Insurance when I needed
to because I could not find appropriate work. During this time, I also paid for
lunchtime and after school care when I could not be home. For the last three years of my education, I
went to school full time while also working full time. For the last two years, we have been
financially independent, though $50,000 in debt to student loans - $20,000
still remaining to be paid). I found
part-time work, and then a full-time job (with a part-time job on the side)
that paid enough to keep us off social assistance and Employment
Insurance. Then
about 18 months ago I found the full-time job I have now that gave us enough
money to move out of MRHA and purchase a modest home. This home is big enough for each child to
have their own room but to save on cost, it is unfinished, so
we still have a lot of work to do to it. It is filled with mostly second hand furniture.
Our oldest son wants to go to Community College to become a
mechanic. He certainly has the skills
and the interest in cars. He is now in
grade ten and my plan was to begin to put money away to pay for his education
starting when he starts grade eleven. Now, that will not happen, nor will I be able to put away any money for
any of the children’s secondary education. Our second oldest son wants to go into computers. The
third oldest, our daughter, plans to become a
veterinarian. Our youngest, a third son,
is undecided, but talks of the usual thing nine-year old boys’ talk about,
being a police officer.
Unfortunately, the Children’s mother made different choices
that will also have an impact on our four children. She remained on social assistance this entire
time and did little to improve her chances of getting a job, even after the
three children (a younger daughter from a later relationship) in the her care were all in school.
My two oldest and I would be delighted to have the two
youngest live
permanently in our home. They have
asked me about living here and I have offered to have them live here half-time
or even full-time if that is what they want but their mmther has refused this
offer even though the children are agreeable to it.
Now that the mother is receiving over $700 a month in Child Support
the Children’s mother will taken off of
Employment Support & Income Assistance and thus be made completely financially
dependent on me. the Child Support will
not only be going to support the
children of the marriage, but will also be supporting the mother and a child
not of the marriage. (She will now only have this source of income and a small
amount of child support from her youngest child’s father.) She will also loose the job search support
available through Community Services if she ever does make an effort to look
for work.
We do not live in luxury and do not have any ‘disposable
income’ by the time we pay the bills. We bought a house that was big enough that each
of the four children can have their own rooms, we keep rooms for them here (and
am still paying to finish their rooms), give them their modest allowances, buy
clothes for them and have full wardrobes for them here, we have them on my
partner’s medical coverage, feed them when they are here (every second weekend
plus any other times they want - such as the entire Christmas break, summer and March break, long weekends, etc.),
buy them over the counter medications when they need them, buy them Xmas /
birthday, Easter gifts, buy them school supplies, school pictures, coats,
boots, shoes, sneakers, toys, etc. etc. etc. - what ever
else they tell me they need, take them on recreational outings and with any
luck, will be taking them on a few camping trips this summer. All of which they
are free to take to their mother's home, and usually do, so I end up purchasing
replacement items over and over again. But I don't mind, as long as they have what they need and are happy.
Neither myself nor my partner of six years drink or smoke,
we have not been out on a ‘date’ since what feels like forever, most of my
clothes came from my step-mother who picked them up at a used clothing store for $2 a piece a couple of years ago and I drive a ten year old Ford
Escort. However, I try to provide some extras for the children. They
have their own telephone line, they have computers on the internet, they have digital cable.
Conversely, the Children’s mother gives very little to her two oldest
children.
Paying
the court ordered amount, or any amount of child support will require me to
take away from the children of the marriage, including the two children I will
be paying support for. In addition to fully supporting the two children in my
care I have always taken the two children who are not in my care for haircuts,
bought them new clothes, jackets, shoes, paid for school pictures and school
supplies or anything else they tell me they need that they are free to take
with them to their mother’s home. All these ‘extras’ that the children get will have to go. The healthy food they
receive in our home will have to switched to Kraft
Dinner and hot dogs. In addition, many
other drastic cuts to the four children’s lifestyle will have to occur in order
for me to even begin to find $752 a month in our budget as that amount is over
one third of my take home pay.
As
a result, all the Children’s mother has achieved by being awarded $752 a month
in child support is hurting the children of the marriage by lowering the
overall combined income of the two households, reestablishing the Children’s
mother’s financial dependence on me, reducing her mother’s options for becoming
financially independent, further alienating her oldest son, angering her second
oldest son, and reducing the amount of money that is going to be available for
all four children’s secondary education.
As a social worker I am left with many questions. Why does
the government and legal system not only promote but requires parents to make
poor parenting choices? Why are the acts, laws, regulations and the legal
interpretations of them, inherently biased in favor of the mother? Why the every growing divorce industry has
been allowed to become self-perpetuating on the backs of fathers, mothers and
children? I also have to ask who is the deadbeat? Me, who has
fulfilled my obligations under our mediated agreement. Me, who has worked hard to support all four
children of the marriage. Or is the children’s mother the
deadbeat. She has done little if
anything to improve here situation. She
remained dependent on social assistance to support her and the two children of
the marriage and one child not of the marriage. She is now going to once again be financially dependent on me and the overall total combined income of the two houses
will drop, reducing the money available to all 4 children. As an adult, let
alone a parent, should the Children’s mother not also be financially
responsible for supporting the children of the marriage, particularly the two
that live with her? As an adult should the children’s mother not be responsible
for supporting herself financially? There is nothing preventing her from getting a job. Finally, I have to ask what out of all this is
in the ‘Best Interest of the Child’?
|
Fathers Thrown into Poverty
in regards to
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/features/lifestyle/orl-livtickoff22062204jun22,1,6461789.column?coll=orl-living-headlines
the person that is
"ticked that the father of my three kids is more than $15,000
behind in child support. Child-support authorities settled with him for $300 and
told me I should be happy to get anything. I thought child-support services was
there to help the kids, not the deadbeat fathers"
In light of the growing number of fathers that are wrongly
accused of being deadbeats, I read this and questioned immediately the validity
of it. I do understand that there truly are those that walk away from their
children.
"Those" include moms as well. However, I have
seen numerous fathers thrown into poverty, and their eventual
death bed, trying to get access to their children as vindictive
women hold them for ransom until they receive so called child
support. Regardless of court ordered access that are ignored
with impunity. I have also seen women sit on their laurels while
waiting for said support rather than pitch in and help out with
their 50% of the financial support.
So much for equal rights. Fathers are too
often expected to take on the entire burden of financial
support, for that which was a joint effort during the marriage,
if not during the actual act of conceiving the child. If one
wants me to support the fact that the children are suffering
solely from lack of financial support, one must prove to me that
they are also upholding their end of the bargain. This would
include their own contributions to the well being of the child
as well. IE financial, emotional, physical, spiritual, well
being, along with allowing a complete, healthy, loving
relationship with the other parent.
Too many children are fatherless, and I am
beginning to see the truth as to the reasons why. It isn't
willingly that they don't see their children, in a large number
of cases.
Deadbeat or beat dead by the courts, and the 'custodial' parent.
.....Darla
http://keancanada.blog-city.com
http://forthesakeofthechildren.blog-city.com
|
|
|
|