Remember, Remember the 5th of November,
The gunpowder treason and plot, I see no reason
why Gunpowder Treason should ever be forgot

Guy Fawkes thumbnail

    ●  EP-BC Home    ● About  Issues & Petitions  TaxCap Testimonials News  Reference Meetings  Fun Stuff Members


Testimonials Area Home

A Judge's Story
Andrade, Franklin, Montreal
Armstrong, Brian
Bailey, Russell , RIP
Brown, Arthur
Carlin, Sara, RIP:  Death by Anti-Depressant
Cino, Sam
Conway, Maurice
Crockford Scott v RCMP
Deadbeat Dad or Mum
Dexel Mark Edward RIP
Duplessis Orphans:  Nazi Experiments
England, Jonathan Vs Lesbian Lover
Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel, NL
Fleury , Theoren: Sexual Abuse
Fredrickson, Rick RIP, Sask
Gonis, Frank & Ashley
Imputed Income Testimonials
Jeffery,  Hal & Danica
Kempling, Dr. Chris
Lohstroh, Rick, RIP: Mother Ass'd Patricide
M
Mabbot, Mel
Manley, Perry, RIP:  RIP:  Suicide-by-Cop
McLaughlin,Terry -  RIP
Millar, Wrongful Arrest
Murtari, John
Prejean, Carrie, Miss CA, "Tolerance...
Prior, Byron: Sexual Abuse by Public Officer
Renouf, Andy - RIP
Samson, Pierre:  Duplessis Orphans
Sielski, Paul:  Debtor’s Prison, Imputed Income
Street, Wilbur - RIP
Thornton: Womens' Threats
Trociuk, Darrel - SCC
White, Darren - RIP
Wiebe, Ken  v Status of Women
Winkler, Matthew-RIP:  Homicidal Moms
Deadbeat Dad or Mum
Fathers 4 Justice
Fathers Thrown into Poverty
MY LONG DISTANCE LIFE

Father Suicide Directory







Jeffery, Hal & Danica: Imputed Income, Debtor's Prison

Hal was a Widower and had a daughter, Danica, from a previous marriage.  He then had two children with a new wife who left him when they were toddlers. (She was reported to have taken up with her Courtenay lawyer.) When our BC Family Courts put Hal through it's torments of Imputed Income, Gleaned Wages, State Imposed Homelessness, and Debtor's Prison, they imposed these same torments on his daughter Danica, then a Tween. Hal points out the Support Tables assume the only children to support are the Payee's children.  You can see where that left Hal & Danica:  homeless and dependent on the kindnesses of neighbors.

More... Imputed Income
Jeffery Hal's Testimonial;
Hall Jeffery's Danica Petition

"Desperate Husbands", by Stephen Perrine

2006-06-18  Keeping Divorced Dads at a Distance, Stephen Perrine,  Stephen Perrine, the editor in chief of Best Life magazine, is the author of the forthcoming "Desperate Husbands."(Thanks, Paul Forseth)

EVERY other weekend for the past four and a half years, I've spent three precious days with my two adolescent daughters. We play tennis in summer, ski in winter, travel when the school schedule allows. But no matter where we are, we're all keenly aware of the thin membrane of secrecy that keeps us from being as close as we were before their mom and I divorced.
<Equal Parenting eliminates this!!!>

Like most divorced fathers, I'm caught in exactly the kind of nightmarish situation that experts on stress say to avoid — a great deal of responsibility, but very little power.I'm the major source of support for my children; my financial obligations are set by the state, and my wages automatically garnished. (If I lost my job tomorrow, and couldn't keep up with my payments, a warrant for my arrest would be issued within two months.) But my influence over how my daughters are being raised is limited, sometimes by decisions their mother makes that I have no input into, and sometimes by their allegiance to her when she and I are at odds.    ...  They'll forget to tell me some detail of their lives — or downright lie if they have to — so I won't feel sad that I've missed something they shared with their mom, or raise issue over some decision she's made with which I might not agree. As a result, I sometimes come away from visits or phone calls feeling shaken, saddened and angry.   My ex and I have been to court over support issues, and we've been to court over custody issues, and the legal battles inevitably trap our children in the middle and force them to choose sides. Sadly, this is exactly what not to do if you want to foster a loving parent-child bond. In a study by a child psychologist,   ...

The first step toward fostering a father and child reunion is to make private mediation of the parenting provisions (physical custody, legal custody and visiting) the standard procedure. Allowing parents the chance to negotiate their support — and possibly give fathers more of a say in how their support is spent — will decrease the vitriol, and let fathers feel more like parents, not just paychecks.

Second, we need to enact and enforce sensible penalties for interfering with visits. Jailing a mother is no way to solve the dispute; neither are financial penalties that hurt her ability to care for the child. But mediation — perhaps compelled by the threat of financial penalty — might be the solution. It's estimated that one in five children of divorce has not seen his or her father in the past year. Without substantial rethinking of our current support and custody law, children will continue to be alienated from their fathers, and lawyers will remain on hand to soak up the resulting legal fees.



Just this month, I received a summons to attend a custody conference at the Allentown, Pa., courthouse, and another letter informing me that an accounting error has left me short on support payments, and that my passport may be suspended. I want to shield my daughters from these harsh truths. So these are the secrets I'll be trying to keep from them as we gather together for Father's Day.  What secrets will they be keeping from me?

Stephen Perrine, the editor in chief of Best Life magazine, is the author of the forthcoming "Desperate Husbands."

For more... canadacourtwatch.com

Rick Fredrickson,AKA "Saskatoon Dad" RIP, needed Adoption Veto


Saskatoon Dad:  Natural Father has no say in Natural Mother's adoption out of his infant son

2007-03-02 City man to appeal custody decision"The Saskatoon man who lost his custody battle with a Prince Albert couple over his biological son is appealing the decision. .. A Saskatchewan judge ruled last month that the Prince Albert couple has the right to raise the nine-month-old boy and the biological father cannot see his son for one year.In the ruling, the judge said the father is "capable of providing a positive adult presence in the baby's life, but not in a parental role." The father said he's hired Regina based lawyer Brad Hunter for the appeal case.  ..  The father ended a relationship with the baby's mother and was unaware of the pregnancy until days before the baby's birth. In a document giving the Prince Albert couple guardianship, the mother stated the identity of the biological father was unknown. <How can a Mother NOT KNOW who the Child's Father is?>

2007-04-18  Saskatoon Father Tries For Visitation Rights

2007-04-13  Father in P.A. custody case applies to resume visitation

2007-03-01  Saskatoon man loses high-profile custody battle, mounts appeal

2007-03-01  Father won't give up the fight

2007-xx-xx  Adoptive parents given custody of son

2007-xx-xx  Dad left out in the cold

2007-02-09  Family Law and Public Opinion Come To a Head in Sask. Custody Dispute

2007-02-02  System failed father

2007-02-01  Attention custody case critics

2007-01-30  Adoptive parents win in father's custody battle

2007-01-30  Sask. adoptive parents win custody of baby boy

2007-01-29  Biological father loses custody case

2007-01-29  Dad questions definition of father as adoptive parents given custody of son

2006-12-20  Saskatoon father cleared of false paternity charges by DNA evidence

2006-12-20  Exchange of cash for baby refuted

2006-12-19  Claims of witchcraft, drugs start child custody trial

2006-11-10  Man must travel to Prince Albert to visit infant son

2006-11-03  Determined dad sees infant son for first time

2006-11-01  Woman gives newborn son up for adoption, Father asked to pay child support to adoptive parents

2006-11-01  Political Commentary

2006-10-31  Trust fund set up for biological father

2006-10-28  Dad's visit with son cancelled

2006-10-27  Judge says it's time dad met infant son

2006-10-26  Judge backs dad's fight to see infant son

2006-10-20  Court battle deepens as dad fights for infant's custody

2006-10-20_Rick Fredrickson wants to be Dad

2006-10-20  Reasonable Insanity: Rick Fredrickson wants to be Dad

2006-10-19_Fight for baby Liam, Saskatchewan father wants to raise the child his ex-girlfriend gave away

2006-10-19  Fight for baby XXXX

2006-10-19_RCMP investigates custody battle

2006-10-14  Father stunned by child support demands in custody battle

2006-10-05  Dad will get to hold infant son

2006-09-16  Man fights for custody of son

2006-09-15  A Father's Fight for Rights

Custody battle example of need to change views

Father in custody battle <Rick Fredrickson> dies in crash, August 14, 2007 

A 35-year-old Saskatoon father at the centre of a nationally publicized custody dispute has been killed in a head-on collision with an allegedly drunk driver headed the wrong way down a divided highway.

The man, who did not know he was a father until shortly before his son’s birth, pursued custody of the boy, known as “Baby Ian” and now 16 months of age, after he was given up for adoption.

Shortly after 10 p.m. Saturday, RCMP were called about a vehicle headed southbound in a northbound lane of Highway 11 near Dundurn. Moments later, they were notified of a crash in the northbound lanes at the turnoff to the Dundurn military base.

They found the 35-year-old man dead at the scene. Passengers in the Pontiac Sunfire, which included a 43-year-old woman, an 82-yearold man and a 65-year-old woman, were also injured.

A 40-year-old Regina man, who had been driving the southbound GMC pickup and accompanying trailer, was not seriously hurt. He has been charged with refusing to provide a breath sample, impaired driving causing death, three counts of impaired driving causing bodily harm, dangerous driving causing death and three counts of dangerous driving causing bodily harm. The man is scheduled to appear in court on Oct. 2 in Hanley.

The family of the deceased declined to comment at this time.

The deceased has been identified as the man who had been fighting a court battle over the custody of his son. The boy’s mother had not informed him of her pregnancy and made adoption arrangements without his input.

While the names of those involved in the court battle were initially published, a later publication ban of those names was ordered by the court.

The father only found out about her pregnancy a few weeks before she gave birth at a Saskatoon hospital in April 2006. Immediately after birth, the baby — given the pseudonym “Baby Ian” by the courts — went into the custody of his adoptive family in Prince Albert. After taking a DNA test three months later, the baby’s father began fighting for custody of his son and in October that year, he and his then-fiancée were granted weekly one-hour visits at a Prince Albert child centre.

In June, an Appeal Court judge granted him one-hour visits with his son every second week, which overruled a January court decision that barred him from seeing the boy in order to give the child a period of “familial calm.”

At the time of the latest decision, the man told The StarPhoenix he was “very excited” about being granted the visitation rights. It was also reported that he was in the process of appealing the entire decision that granted full custody to the Prince Albert couple.

Saskatoon man who lost child custody fight dies in car accident

2007-08-14  Saskatoon man who lost child custody fight dies in car accident

A Saskatchewan man who lost a high-profile child custody dispute has died in a car accident.  ..  The Saskatoon man, who did not know he was a father until shortly before his son was born, sought custody of the boy after he was given to a couple by the mother.  ..  The case was heard in December, but Court of Queen's Bench Justice Shawn Smith ruled last January that the boy should remain with his custodial parents in Prince Albert, Sask.

Mark Vanstone, the man's lawyer, said his death ends an appeal of the ruling.  ..  The name of the father cannot be released because of a publication ban.  ..  RCMP say the man died Saturday in a crash near the Dundurn military base south of Saskatoon. He was driving a car that was hit head-on by a truck pulling a trailer on the wrong side of the highway.  <Rick's death seems all too convenient!!!!!>

During the custody battle, court heard that the father was involved in a casual sexual relationship with the baby's mother, but she didn't tell him she was pregnant until shortly before the child was born. A DNA test confirmed paternity.  ..  But the biological mother had already arranged for the Prince Albert couple, whom her family had known for 14 years, to take the child.

The biological father said he wanted to raise the boy. But the couple's lawyer pointed out that the biological parents suffered from alcoholism, failed relationships and unlawful conduct. The man had also fathered children in other relationships.

In his ruling, Justice Shawn Smith said the father could be a positive influence in the boy's life, but not in a parental role. He barred the father from seeing his son for one year in order to give the couple time to bond with
<DECEIVE> the child.

I not only lost a son, but a Grandson,  Carol Fredrickson (Mother)

I want to thank all the people that supported the Saskatoon Dad in his fight for his son.  Justice was not served in our family court.  A drunk driver killed the Saskatoon Dad; he left us as a ‘hero’.  I sincerely hope that justice will be served in the criminal court of law.  I not only lost a son, but also a grandson, a grandson that will find his real family when he is old enough.

The Saskatoon Dad would have set a precedent for other dad's fighting for their children. He was determined not to give up his fight.

I have been promised that inquirers will be done as to:

  1. How and why the baby left the hospital, without the dad's consent?

  2. Why the dad wasn't informed when the mother knew all along whom the father was?

  3. Why social services were not involved, and knew nothing about the custodial agreement?

  4. How a judge that was never an expert in family law decide on a family court case?

  5. How a person can lie on an affidavit and get away with it?

  6. How a person can get occurrence numbers, and reference numbers from the police station, when they tell me that police are not allowed to give out this information, to anyone. Where is the confidentiality?

  7. What happened to the closing arguments that were not included in the court transcripts, someone had to stop them from being included, who and why?

I have lots of questions that I need answers to and I promise you, I will not stop until my questions have been answered.

Carol Fredrickson (Mother)

Fight for baby Liam, Saskatchewan father wants to raise the child his ex-girlfriend gave away, October 19, 2006

October 19, 2006

The photographs of baby Liam are posted on a Web site, uploaded there by a Saskatchewan woman who has raised the boy since the days after his birth at the request of his biological mother -- who decided she could not care for him herself.

But the site is also where Liam's biological father, Rick Fredrickson, saw him for the first time, after months of trying to win custody of the child that DNA tests prove is his.

"This was my introduction to my son," said Mr. Fredrickson, who has never met the baby in person and found the pictures as a result of Googling the child's caregivers' names.

The Web site is simply one facet of a bizarre and complex custody battle in Saskatchewan, which pits Mr. Fredrickson and the rights of a father against the couple given custody of the baby by his former girlfriend, and who claim he was nothing more than a "sperm donor."

On Nov. 13, a pre-trial will begin in a Saskatoon court to establish who will win the right to raise Liam, who is now almost six months old, but the dispute has already escalated into a public -- and intensely personal -- battle.

And although Mr. Fredrickson has never met his son, the custodial parents have inquired through their lawyer as to whether he is interested in making child support payments.

"It's entirely common situation where the father admits paternity and does not have custody that he's got an obligation to pay child support," said Dale Blenner-Hassert, a lawyer representing the Rollers. "It's not about to whom it goes, but that it's for the support of the child."

Mr. Fredrickson, however, says he has no plans to send money to "a third party when I have been saying all along that I want to bring him up myself."

Liam was born on April 26, 2006, at the Royal University Hospital in Saskatoon.

His mother, Oriole Bird, had been in a relationship with Mr. Fredrickson that had ended the previous November. She had never told him she was expecting a baby.

Instead, she arranged a custody and guardianship agreement with Brian Roller and his wife, Nicola Sherwin-Roller, a married couple she knew who live in nearby Prince Albert, Sask., and who are unable to have children of their own.

The custody arrangement, which legal experts say is a precursor to formal adoption, awarded them the right to raise Liam as their own, collect the federal child tax credit and even apply to change his last name to their own.

The agreement was dated April 27, 2006, the day after Liam's birth. It stated that "the biological father of the child is not known."

But court documents show that Ms. Bird did know who the father was, and that on April 23, Mr. Fredrickson had found out as well, through a phone call from her stepbrother.

After that call, Mr. Fredrickson says -- in interviews and sworn affidavits -- he did everything possible to establish his involvement in the child's life.

He tried to make contact with Ms. Bird, but she would not take his calls, and so he communicated to her family that he and his new fiancee were willing to raise the baby.

Then, Mr. Fredrickson says he began contacting social service agencies, trying to determine his legal rights and how to establish the baby's paternity.

He was told red flags would be raised and that after the baby was born, authorities would intervene.

But Mr. Fredrickson was not notified of Liam's birth, and found out only weeks later that the baby had gone home with another family.

The agencies he had contacted earlier now told him the matter was a custody dispute and outside their jurisdiction. They advised him to get a lawyer and a DNA test.

Mr. Fredrickson did both, and when the paternity test came back, he was both a new father and a newly minted father's rights advocate.

But soon things became even more complicated.

Dorothy Bird, Oriole's mother, told him she believed her other daughter, a family services director for a native band, had surreptitiously arranged for her friends, the Rollers, to take custody of the baby.

Mr. Fredrickson began to suspect that money had changed hands, a claim he says is supported by the new car his unemployed former girlfriend bought shortly after giving birth.

He has taken that story to the news media and related it in an interview with the RCMP, who were asked by the Canadian Children's Rights Council, a father's advocacy group, to investigate a possible "illegal adoption."

Reached at his Prince Albert home, Mr. Roller said he would not respond to "lies and bulls---" and said Mr. Fredrickson's biological role in Liam's birth "is the only true thing" in the case he has brought forward.

Mr. Blenner-Hassert said claims of illegal activity by his clients are "entirely false."

"No money, no backroom deal," he said. "It was simply a private custody agreement between two parties."

But his clients are also firing back with allegations of their own.

In an affidavit sworn by Nicola Sherwin-Roller, she alleges Mr. Fredrickson was once charged with "communicating with another person for the purpose of engaging in prostitution with an underage individual."

"I am very concerned that the Petitioner is but the provider of the sperm that produced Liam and is nothing more to him," she stated. "Further, I am concerned that the Petitioner is not a safe and trustworthy individual."

Mark Vanstone, Mr. Fredrickson's lawyer, said his client -- "like a lot of people" -- was once charged with a criminal act, but that he maintains his innocence and was never convicted.

"How they got that information is another source of interest for us," he said.

The personal attacks have added to already complicated court proceedings and tense communications between both sides.

On Oct. 4, a judge ordered that Mr. Fredrickson would be given one hour a week to visit with his son. But when the day of the first visit arrived, Mr. Fredrickson claims the Rollers cancelled, saying the timing was "inconvenient."

Three weeks after the access order was given, he has still only seen his baby via the Internet -- photographs located on a genealogy Web site.

Mr. Vanstone is confident his client will get his wish in the long run.

"It's a case about whether the child has a right to be with his natural parent or not," he said. "And I think there is precedent under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child putting some kind of premium on that relationship."

But Mr. Blenner-Hassert said biology is not a trump card under Canadian family law.

"At best, he's got some access rights," he said. "The test is: What's in the best interest of the child?"

Leslie Belloc-Pinder, a family lawyer and sessional instructor at the University of Saskatchewan, agrees.

Arguing that it is in the best interest to leave a child with a foster parent, guardian or even a social services agency has defeated the claims of biological parents before, she said, in decisions made all the way up to the Supreme Court of Canada.

And the fact that Liam has been raised by the Rollers since birth will work in their favour, she added, as few courts support removing a child from a happy home.

canada, canadian search engine, free email, canada news"The amount of time this child has spent with the family is relevant," she said. "I know the dad's point of view is that only happened because he didn't know what was going on, but time is not on his side."      sagrell@nationalpost.com

Rick Fredrickson wants to be Dad, Friday, October 20, 2006

While DNA tests have proven that baby Liam is biologically Rick Fredrickson's son, Rick wants to be his dad. Rick (of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan) had an off and on relationship with Liam's mother Oriole Bird, during which time Liam was conceived. However the mother did not inform Rick of his impending fatherhood (and in fact claimed in documentation, to not know who the father was-a lie disproved by her relatives that all very well knew Rick was the dad), instead arraigning for a family friend to take the child. Close to the child's birth Rick did find out about baby Liam through Oriole's stepbrother and since then has been trying to get help to get custody of his son. Liam was born in April, DNA tests proved Rick's fatherhood in July, yet here we are in October and Rick has yet to meet his son. Nicola Sherwin-Roller and her husband are refusing to relinquish custody and have made demands that Rick must abide by before they will let him see the child. Even after a judge ordered visitation rights to Rick and Barb Hesketh-Jones (his fiancée) last month. I would like to know why has this couple not been looked at for contravening a court order?

The first issue that the Roller's stated in their case against Rick, was that Children's Haven (the access facilitator) had voiced concerns about Rick's fiancee being in on the visits. The insinuation was that the facility did not want anyone other than Rick to visit. Then the Rollers went on to demand that Rick not refer to himself as "Daddy" or take any pictures of his son. It is absolutely absurd that this couple is not only depriving this man of his rights as a father but want to downgrade him to a strange man that visits Liam once a week for an hour, while at the same time making a demand for child support. They said through their lawyer that they don't 'need' the money, but they want it anyway. Because they were given custody by the mother, they feel they have the same rights as the mother. I beg to differ and would really like to know why the courts have been messing around this long.

Are the courts waiting until the child is old enough to remember it all and be thoroughly traumatized? Give that child to his father now and let the Rollers (who have NO biological connection to him) try to fight for custody or visitation rights. I mean really, this one is a no brainer.

Now I refer back to the insinuation made by the Roller's that Children's Haven was against Rick's fiancée Beth being involved with the child. Through Children's Haven's own lawyer (Marty Popuscul) we learn that they have denied staff had any issue with Beth attending the visits. Haven reiterated that their purpose is infact to help children and their parents be together. Not to hinder the process. The general policy of restricting visits to "just parents" is not carved in stone and in this particular case would be changed, due to the Court Order. Nicola proved by insinuating such things, that she is not beyond distorting truth to further her own agenda (which I really question as to whether or not includes Liam's best interest)

Perhaps Nicola thought that her personal connection with the facility would help her, as she stated in a sworn affidavit that she was a regular donor and at one time sat on the board for the facility (in the 90s). The only thing that that proves to me, is that the use of this particular facility is indeed a conflict of interest and the court should designate a different facility.

Nicola's lawyer also tried to pressure Rick's lawyer in to stopping him from going to the media. I hope that Rick and his lawyer completely disregard these "requests". While the media can often be a hindrance, in this particular case I believe it could help. Perhaps a "well to do" benefactor or legal experts will see Rick's story and step forward to help him.

Far too often in this day and age, fathers and mothers are walking away or doing far worse to their children. Here is a man that wants to wholeheartedly take on the responsibilities of fatherhood, but is being hampered by a couple that has no biological connection to the child and a court system that moves at a snails pace.

2006-10-20  Reasonable Insanity: Rick Fredrickson wants to be Dad

 

Rick Fredrickson, RIP AKA "Saskatoon Dad" August 2007, needed Adoption Veto

Rick Fredrickson, "Saskatoon Dad" - Google Search

"RCMP say the man died Saturday in a crash near the Dundurn military base south of Saskatoon. He was driving a car that was hit head-on by a truck pulling a trailer on the wrong side of the highway."  <Rick's death seems all too convenient!!!!!>

2006-10-14_Father stunned by child support demands in custody battle - Star Phoenix"A Saskatoon father who is battling with a Prince Albert couple for custody of his five-month-old son got a shock this week in the form of a letter demanding that he pay <the adoptive parents> child support.

"Shame on them," Rick Fredrickson said in an interview, after learning the couple who left a Saskatoon hospital with his newborn son this spring  while he desperately sought help asserting his Paternity & Right to custody   ..

<The Adoptive Parents> now want access to his financial records in order to calculate how much he should pay them for the child's care."

More:  Testimonials:  Rick Fredrickson, Saskatoon Dad;
Issues:  Adoption Veto for Dads

Child Support Tables are Hyper-inflated, Orders are Doubled

After much wrangling with SOW, the hyperinflated Child Support Tables were accepted by the Joint Senate-Commons Committee on Child Custody and Access for passage into Law, provided that passed with it would be the Shared Parenting Legislation proposed in FTSOTC Recommendations.   The Liberal Government adopted the extortionate Child Support Tables, but double crossed the Committee by tabling the Shared Parenting Legislation agreed to at FTSOTC Geologist Alar Soever later analyzed  the Tables in 2002-04-02  Child Support Tables, Alar Soever

More Child Support Fraud;
Letters to MP: I have $104.58 left over after paying child support;
2004-02-19  Hedy Fry (SOW) fights fairness in Custody

Erin Pizzey, Founder of the Women's Shelter Movement: 

Erin Pizzey

"Why I loathe feminism... and believe it will ultimately destroy the family"

Erin Pizzey - Google Search
Erin Pizzey - Google Videos

2008-02-14  Erin Pizzey on KFBK talk radio (Sacramento, California)

Erin Pizzey is  the founder of the women's shelter movement and of the first modern women's refuge (1971, Chiswick, London, England)

More:  Issues:  Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam;
Issues:  "Women's Shelter" Gulags:  Lesbian Brainwashing & Seduction Camps
Issues:  Cools, Senator Anne: Lying Lawyers;
News:  Liberal Hedy Fry / Status of Women (SOW):
Issues:  Pedophiles Fear Dads;
Issuess:  False Accusations;
Issues:  Domestic Violence Fraud
Issues:  Child Trafficking by Public Officers & Judges


     
Copyright 2002  equalparenting-bc.ca 

 

    Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages  exercising democratic rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.