Testimonials Area Home
A Judge's Story Andrade, Franklin, Montreal Armstrong, Brian Bailey, Russell , RIP Brown, Arthur Carlin, Sara, RIP: Death by Anti-Depressant Cino, Sam Conway, Maurice Crockford Scott v RCMP Deadbeat Dad or Mum Dexel Mark Edward RIP Duplessis Orphans: Nazi Experiments England, Jonathan Vs Lesbian Lover Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel, NL Fleury , Theoren: Sexual Abuse Fredrickson, Rick RIP, Sask Gonis, Frank & Ashley Imputed Income Testimonials Jeffery, Hal & Danica Kempling, Dr. Chris Lohstroh, Rick, RIP: Mother Ass'd Patricide M Mabbot, Mel Manley, Perry, RIP: RIP: Suicide-by-Cop McLaughlin,Terry - RIP Millar, Wrongful Arrest Murtari, John Prejean, Carrie, Miss CA, "Tolerance... Prior, Byron: Sexual Abuse by Public Officer Renouf, Andy - RIP Samson, Pierre: Duplessis Orphans Sielski, Paul: Debtors Prison, Imputed Income Street, Wilbur - RIP Thornton: Womens' Threats Trociuk, Darrel - SCC White, Darren - RIP Wiebe, Ken v Status of Women Winkler, Matthew-RIP: Homicidal Moms Deadbeat Dad or Mum Fathers 4 Justice Fathers Thrown into Poverty MY LONG DISTANCE LIFE
|
Father
Suicide Directory








|
Hal
was a Widower and had a daughter, Danica, from a previous marriage.
He then had two children with a new wife who left him when they were
toddlers. (She was reported to have taken up with her Courtenay
lawyer.) When our BC Family Courts put Hal
through
it's torments of Imputed Income,
Gleaned Wages,
State Imposed Homelessness,
and
Debtor's Prison, they imposed these same torments on his
daughter Danica, then a Tween. Hal points out the Support Tables
assume the only children to support are the Payee's children.
You can see where that left Hal & Danica: homeless and
dependent on the kindnesses of neighbors.
More...
Imputed Income
Jeffery Hal's Testimonial;
Hall Jeffery's Danica Petition
|
"Desperate Husbands", by Stephen Perrine
2006-06-18 Keeping Divorced Dads at a Distance, Stephen
Perrine, Stephen Perrine, the editor in chief of
Best Life magazine, is
the author of the forthcoming "Desperate Husbands."(Thanks,
Paul Forseth)
EVERY other weekend for the past four and a half years, I've spent
three precious days with my two adolescent daughters. We play tennis
in summer, ski in winter, travel when the school schedule allows.
But no matter where we are, we're all keenly aware of the thin
membrane of secrecy that keeps us from being as close as we were
before their mom and I divorced. <Equal
Parenting eliminates this!!!>
Like most divorced fathers, I'm caught in
exactly the kind of nightmarish situation that experts on stress say
to avoid a great deal of responsibility, but very little power.I'm
the major source of support for my children; my financial
obligations are set by the state, and my wages automatically
garnished. (If I lost my job tomorrow, and couldn't keep up with my
payments, a warrant for my arrest would be issued within two
months.) But my influence over how my daughters are being raised is
limited, sometimes by decisions their mother makes that I have no
input into, and sometimes by their allegiance to her when she and I
are at odds. ... They'll forget to tell me
some detail of their lives or downright lie if they have to so I
won't feel sad that I've missed something they shared with their
mom, or raise issue over some decision she's made with which I might
not agree. As a result, I sometimes come away from visits or phone
calls feeling shaken, saddened and angry. My ex and I
have been to court over support issues, and we've been to court over
custody issues, and the legal battles inevitably trap our children
in the middle and force them to choose sides. Sadly, this is exactly
what not to do if you want to foster a loving parent-child bond. In
a study by a child psychologist, ...
The first step toward fostering a father and child reunion is to
make private mediation of the parenting provisions (physical
custody, legal custody and visiting) the standard procedure.
Allowing parents the chance to negotiate their support and
possibly give fathers more of a say in how their support is spent
will decrease the vitriol, and let fathers feel more like parents,
not just paychecks.
Second, we need to enact and enforce
sensible penalties for interfering with visits. Jailing a mother
is no way to solve the dispute; neither are financial penalties
that hurt her ability to care for the child. But mediation
perhaps compelled by the threat of financial penalty might be
the solution. It's estimated that one in five children of
divorce has not seen his or her father in the past year. Without
substantial rethinking of our current support and custody law,
children will continue to be alienated from their fathers, and
lawyers will remain on hand to soak up the resulting legal fees.

Just this month, I received a summons to attend a custody
conference at the Allentown, Pa., courthouse, and another letter
informing me that an accounting error has left me short on
support payments, and that my passport may be suspended. I want
to shield my daughters from these harsh truths. So these are the
secrets I'll be trying to keep from them as we gather together
for Father's Day. What secrets will they be keeping from
me?
Stephen Perrine, the editor in chief of Best Life magazine, is
the author of the forthcoming "Desperate Husbands."
For more...
canadacourtwatch.com
|
| |
Imputed Income Testimonials
Why I moved to England:
Being in the computer industry, and since my marriage broke up in 1999 in the
midst of the Y2K panic, I was making a lot of money ($90k - $100k). Since the
break up Y2K stuff ended and the bottom fell out of the computer job market.
Rates dropped through the floor. My ex claimed I was making more than I was at
Y2K ($140k), when actually I was making about half ($55k). Though the judge
based his decision less than my ex claimed, he still stated I could make more
money than I was making ($70k). Then I got involved in the motor vehicle
accident and I ended up making less income on disability payments each month
($400 every week) than I was ordered to pay in support ($2,444 per month).
There's a problem with that. I can't pay more than I make. However the law is
the law and the enforcement agency is basing things on what I could be earning,
not what I am earning. I spoke with four lawyers about it (who advised I leave
the country) three in Toronto and one in Manchester. One of them, a criminal
lawyer, told me his colleague, a QC (which is a senior lawyer,) was in a similar
situation and the judge sent him down for 90 days. I don't want to go to jail. I
am paying support (but at the level of my actual income based on the Canadian
government guidelines) and I will continue to do so. However that's not good
enough for the way the government wants things.
When the Progressive Conservatives got into power I thought they would be good
for business, and maybe they were. However this form of strict dictatorship is
totally uncalled for and certainly makes a mockery of the so-called "Justice
System." In fact, these "dead beat Dads" become a result of the government's
high handed actions, not of the fathers' refusal to pay support.
As I said, even in England I am sending the support, it's just that the
enforcement agency doesn't accept that it's enough. Bad as this may seem, I've
heard horror tales worse than mine. What can you do about it? I decided the only
thing is to make a new life of it. I checked out what it means and the
limitations of the Ontario legislation (they can't extradite for non-criminal
offences) and figured despite the heartache of leaving the kids, I don't have a
choice. It's not a case of seeing them or moving to England. It's a case of not
seeing them from jail or not seeing them from England. And on top of this, I'm
not only not a criminal, the law also recognises that it's not a criminal
offence. What a crazy world! The sad thing is that one letter from my ex to
relieve the enforcement agency of their duty and none of this would have to
happen, but she keeps telling the kids that she wants to see me in jail. It's
really sad. Still I am looking to a new life now.
The actual situation is rather worse than this, but that's it in a nutshell. Let
me know if you want more. The one judge, maybe two of them actually, totally
ignored the international code of justice, of which Canada is a signatory, and I
think that means that Ontario judges are supposed to abide by it. However, if I
had pointed that out in court of course I would have risked being in contempt of
court and once again being in jail. There's no way to win against an anti
democratic legal system like this. So - I decided not to play by their rules - I
left the game. I went to someone else's game where the rules are rather more
fair. Actually I did try a lot harder than this, and I offered many chances of
settlement, but there's no way to work with these people. They cannot see
reason.
Blessings, D
http://www.petitiononline.com/b4kidsok/petition.html
|
|
|
|