Testimonials Area Home
A Judge's Story Andrade, Franklin, Montreal Angus, Bob: Passport Removal & Privacy Armstrong, Brian Bailey, Russell , RIP Bayne, Paul & Zabeth: Child Abduction Boys Of St. Vincent = Mount Cashel, NL Brown, Arthur Carlin, Sara, RIP: Death, Anti-Depressant Charles I of England: RIP 1649 Cino, Sam Conway, Maurice Crockford Scott v RCMP Deadbeat Dad or Mum Dexel Mark Edward RIP Duplessis Orphans: Nazi Experiments England, Jonathan Vs Lesbian Lover Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel, NL Fleury , Theoren: Sexual Abuse Fredrickson, Rick RIP, Sask Gonis, Frank & Ashley Imputed Income Testimonials Jeffery, Hal & Danica Jessen, Gianna: Surviving Your Abortion Lobel, Thomas: 8 yr old Boy.. for sex-change Lohstroh, Rick, RIP: Mother / Patricide M Mabbot, Mel Manley, Perry, RIP: RIP: Suicide-by-Cop Maran,Meredith: False Accusations McLaughlin,Terry - RIP Millar, Wrongful Arrest Morneau, Roger: Luciferians in Montreal Mount Cashel Orphanage, NL Murtari, John Nicholson, Rob: BC's Protected Pedophile Rings O'Brien, Cathy: Childhood Sex Abuse, NLP Prejean, Carrie, Miss CA, "Tolerance... Prior, Byron: Child Rape by Public Officer Renouf, Andy T. RIP Judicial Kleptomania Russert, Tim: RIP June 13, 2008 Samson, Pierre: Duplessis Orphans Sielski, Paul: Debtor’s Prison Smith, Ashley, RIP: Teen Suicide Street, Wilbur - RIP Seccuro, Elizabeth: Date Rape Thornton: Womens' Threats Trociuk, Darrel - SCC White, Darren - RIP Whitepen, Baldy: "Horsefeathers" Wiebe, Ken v Status of Women Winkler, Matthew-RIP: Homicidal Moms Deadbeat Dad or Mum Fathers 4 Justice Fathers Thrown into Poverty MY LONG DISTANCE LIFE
|
Father
Suicide Directory








Hester Lessard, Feminist Law, University of
Victoria


"Heterosexual View of Parenthood must be
ignored"
Lessard, Hester - Google Search;
Lessard, Hester: UVic Faculty of Law
"Trociuk is
.. a disheartening endorsement of biological concepts of
parenthood ... flawed .... it legitimizes a heterosexual view
of the family. .. It must be ignored."





 More:
News: Lessard,
Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
 News:
Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issus:
Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials: Rick
Fredrickson of Saskatoon |
David Ramsay of Prince George: BC Judge &
Pedophile

BC Judge David Ramsay: - Google Search;
BC Judge David Ramsay: - Google Videos
This is a Judge practicing his sexual orientation
for decades while on the BC Bench. It is inconceivable that
the Law Enforcement officers and other Judges were unaware of all
his activities. Law Enforcement Officers, are of course unable
to act without the support of the Judiciary.
More:
News: Ramsay, Judge
David;
Testimonials:
Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel Orphange, NL;
Testimonials: Prior, Byron:
Sexual Abuse;
Testimonials: Earle,
Shane: Mount Cashel;;
Testimonials: Samson, Pierre:
Duplessis Orphans, QU
News: Mount Cashel
Orphanage, St. John's NL;
News: Duplessis Orphans:
Nazi Experiments
Orphange, NL
Issues: Boys Of St.
Vincent <Mount Cashel, NL>;
Issues: Judicial
Freemasonry
Issues:
Judicial Interpretation
Issues: Child
Trafficking by Public Officers & Judges |
Darrin White,
RIP of Prince George,
BC

Death by
Judicial Kleptomania
- Manslaughter, Suicide, March
2000
Darrin White, suicide, Prince George - Google Search;
Darrin White, suicide, Prince George - Google Video
"Darren
White died in March of 2000 by his own hand. BC Supreme Court
Master Doug Baker had just ordered Darren to pay
$2,071
per month in child and spousal support. His monthly income at
the time of that order was only $950 after taxes.
..He
was also paying $439 a month to support an
older child from a previous
marriage.
...
No one would listen to my
father , no one would give him a chance to speak. ... My dad was an
abused husband, he was abused by his wife, and the justice system.
... He was a kind man who fought a good fight but no matter what he
did or said, he could never win with this system. "
More...
Testimonials: Darren White, RIP
Testimonials:
Mark Dexel, RIP of Kamloops, BC;
Testimonials:
Manley, Perry: RIP
Testimonials:
Jeffery,
Hal & Danica
Issues:
Custody Orders not Enforced;
Issues:
Parental Alienation Syndrome;
Issues: Imputed
income;
Issues: Child
Support Fraud;
Issues: Debtors'
Prison Reinstituted |
Byron Prior: Adult Child of
Prostitute / Child Pimp Mother

Newfoundland's protection of Pedophiles in Public
Service
2008-09-16 PRIOR: Why wont anyone hear me Mission Unstoppable.mp3
Byron Prior - Google Search;
Byron Prior - Google Videos
Byron Prior is an
Adult Child of Sexual Abuse who is breaking the
"Conspiracy of Silence" of his family's Perpetrator.

EPT: PRIOR, Byron, Protection of Pedophiles in Public Service, 2006
DISCUSSION-EPT: PRIOR, Byron, Protection of Pedophiles in Public
Service



More:
Testimonials: Prior, Byron:
Sexual Abuse;
Testimonials: Mount
Cashel Orphanage, St. John's NL;
Issues:
Boys Of St. Vincent <Mount Cashel, NL>
News: Ramsay, Judge
David BC Judge & Pedophile
News:
Hickman, T. Alex, NL Judge, alleged Pedophile
Testimonials:
Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel Orphange, NL;
Testimonials:
Samson, Pierre: Duplessis Orphans, QU
News: Duplessis Orphans ;
Issues: Child
Trafficking by Public Officers & Judges;
Issues: Judicial
Freemasonry;
News:
Crowley, Aleister: Luciferian Freemasonry;
News: Pike,
Albert: Luciferian Freemasonry |
Dr. Rick Lohstroh, RIP August
2004

Mother Assisted Patricide:
Murdered by 10 year old Son with Mom's gun, Galveston, TX
Rick Lohstroh, murder - Google Search;
Rick Lohstroh, murder - Google Video
Deborah Geisler - Google Search
"Lohstroh, a 41-year-old
emergency-room doctor, was shot in the back Friday when he went to
pick up his two sons at their mother's home. Police say the
10-year-old boy climbed into the back of his father's sport utility
vehicle, fired a pistol several times through the back of the
driver's seat and then ran back inside the home."

More...
Testimonials: Lohstroh, Dr.
Rick, RIP: Mother Assisted Patricide;
Testimonials:
Winkler, Matthew-RIP: Immunity for Homicidal Moms;
Issues:
"Stockholm Syndrome" Paradigm Shift creates a "Victim-Perpetrator";
Issues:
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD;
Issues: Legal
Abuse Syndrome; |
| |
Dear Editors at the CBC,
My name is M. and I am a father of two young children, and I live in Burnaby,
BC.
Last year I went through a divorce trial in the Supreme Court of British
Columbia, in front of
Justice Duncan Shaw . (This is the same Justice that struck down
the part of the criminal code that said possessing child pornography was a
crime). Although I have a good job, I was not able to afford a lawyer in my
two-week trial, and there was no legal aid to help me. I was slaughtered in that
trial by the ex-wife's legal aid lawyer and and also by the Judge. The Judge
rendered a judgment only hours after the trial ended, and he also announced he
had a verdict part-way through the trial! The judgment itself is a litany of
contradictions and contraventions to the Divorce Act. It was the worst custody
Judgment I have ever read, and I have read most every published family
judgment from the Supreme Court of BC for the last 5 years. It is no wonder
that the Shaw J REFUSES to publish my judgment. I am trying to Appeal it
because of the flagrant abuses of the law and proceedings in that judgment. But
alas, I have even less money now (I am in debt beyond my means to repay) and I
am trying to take on the Appeals Court by myself. Believe me, this is the most
stressful and upsetting thing I have ever done, and I wont be surprised if I
land in hospital because of this.
However, to the bigger picture. This country's CHILDREN NEED EQUAL PARENTING.
What I mean by that is there should be a presumption in law that children NEED
(require, can't exist without, etc) both the Mother and the Father EQUALLY.
Although this is hinted at in the Divorce Act, it is a well known fact that it
is abused to the fullest extent by, in the most part, mothers, their lawyers,
and the Judges that condone and promote this. This is in effect tantamount to
abuse of children, and in no way reflects on the best interests of the children.
When judges are finding that the majority of fathers seeking custody (joint or
sole) and equal access are actually loving, caring and competent, (and even more
so than the mothers in many cases) the Judges must fight back even harder to
vilify the father and remove custody from him. Thus reducing the father's role
in a post-separation family to be a pay check and a casual visitor of his very
own children. The children only suffer because of this.
Family law in this country has gotten way out of control, especially in BC and
Ontario. We need to legislate a law that requires parents to have joint custody
and equal access to the children, and that anything otherwise will require a
very high threshold of proof to remove that from one of the parents. Take for
example the proposed legislation in the state of Tennessee. This is the right
way to do it: equal, simple, and effective. What ever happened to the report
"For the Sake of the Children?" that I heard so much about a few years ago, but
it has disappeared. Why is the government pushing through legislation to protect
and enhance other groups' rights in Canada, but however completely ignoring
anything to do with protecting our Children's rights, after separation or
divorce. If about 50% of marriages end up in divorces, that would imply that
there are a lot of children out there who would be affected and would benefit
from protection of their rights. It would be much more than the number of people
in the other groups that are successfully getting what they want. One reason for
this is that the children don't have a strong voice... after all they are
children. The few people that publicly triumph children's rights (for example
equal parenting advocates and the Honourable Senator Anne Cools) are not heard
adequately by the media. But biggest reason is that the Family law industry (and
it is an industry) is massive and huge amounts of money get put into the pockets
of the legal industry and taken out of the mouths of children. Judges and
lawyers don't want to find themselves out of very lucrative work, so they
promote and strengthen the adversarial role of family law. Our government needs
to step in and get rid of this abuse.
I want this issue to be part of this coming election and I think that we need
much more media exposure on the plight of court-ordered fatherless children.
Please address this issue in your broadcasts and when you interview the
politicians for this election.
The future of Canada is our children. If they are subject to abuse by the
highest levels of Government and Judiciary, then we will have a sorry state of
affairs indeed.
Respectfully yours, M., Father
|
|
Criminal Code ban on possession
violates Charter of Rights, ruling says
by Jane Armstrong
The Globe &l Mail
Saturday, January 16, 1999VANCOUVER -- The British
Columbia Supreme Court has struck down a section of the Criminal
Code that outlaws the possession of child pornography, ruling
that the law violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
"The invasion of freedom of expression and personal privacy
is profound", Mr.
Justice Duncan Shaw wrote in a 33-page judgment released
yesterday.
"The intrusion into freedom of expression and the right of
privacy is so profound that it is not outweighed by the limited
beneficial effects of the prohibition."
The judgment is binding only in British Columbia, but other
provinces can look to it for guidance. Geoffrey Gaul, a
spokesman for Attorney-General Ujjal Dosanjh, said the province
will decide next week whether to appeal.
Police in B.C. said they are concerned about the decision.
"The consensus in the law-enforcement community is that child
pornography is a serious issue," said RCMP Sergeant Russ Grabb.
"However, Charter rights are paramount in this country."
The judgment stems from a case against a Vancouver man, John
Robin Sharpe, who faced four charges stemming from two arrests.
In the first case, Canada Customs officials seized computer
disks titled Sam Paloc's Flogging, Fun and Fortitude, and
A Collection of Kiddie Kink Classics. The next spring,
police raided Mr. Sharpe's home and seized books, manuscripts,
stories and photographs.
Mr. Sharpe was charged with two counts of possessing child
pornography and two counts of possession for the purpose of
distributing and selling the material.
Mr. Sharpe represented himself in court, arguing that both
sets of charges violated his constitutional rights.
The Crown presented evidence that children are abused during
the manufacture of pornographic material. The court also heard
from an expert that child pornography perpetuates an illegal and
immoral assumption that child-adult sex can be natural and does
not harm children.
Judge Shaw held that a person's private home and belongings,
such as books, diaries, pictures and clothes, are an important
expression of an individual's identity. To prohibit an
individual from possessing child pornography is too great an
intrusion on individual freedom, he ruled.
To forbid an individual to simply possess pornography singles
out collectors who are simply interested in pornography, but who
don't harm anyone, he ruled.
He also held that other sections of the Criminal Code protect
children from abuse and exploitation arising from pornography.
In striking down the Criminal Code provision against
possession, Judge Shaw also appeared to agree with a theory that
sexual aggressors or pedophiles use child pornography to
masturbate and "relieve pent-up sexual tension" instead of
preying on children, thereby posing less of a threat to them.
"Whether or not this cathartic effect outweighs the harm
caused by the possession of pornography is not known, but it is
nonetheless a significant factor to take into account."
However, Judge Shaw upheld laws prohibiting the sale and
distribution of child pornography.
Pornography critics were angered by the decision, arguing
that the possession of child pornography is not a harmless act.
Shari Graydon, executive director of MediaWatch, a group
monitoring depictions of women and girls in the media, said
allowing individuals to possess child pornography is tantamount
to condoning the sexual exploitation of children.
"The very existence of pornography featuring children, on
some level, condones and normalizes and makes acceptable the
sexual objectification of children, which most people will
categorically agree is not appropriate and is not acceptable and
should not be condoned."
A spokesman for federal Justice Minister Anne McLellan said
that the federal department had not had time to study the
decision, but pointed out that the decision on an appeal must
come from the provincial Attorney-General.
Private Purposes
"First and foremost, the invasion of freedom of expression and
personal privacy is profound.
"Further, the prohibition extends to all persons including
those who make no harmful use of pornography. The prohibition
also includes pedophiles, who, instead of preying on children,
use pornography for very private purposes, such as relief from
their affliction by masturbation.
"As noted earlier, sexually explicit pornography is used to
relieve pent-up sexual tension of otherwise potential
aggressors. Whether or not this cathartic effect outweighs the
harm caused by the possession of pornography is not known, but
it is nonetheless a significant factor to take into account.
"The ban includes 'mildly erotic' pornography . . . although
the evidence indicates that 'mildly erotic' pornography has the
effect of reducing sexual aggressions against children."
-- Mr. Justice Duncan Shaw
The Child-Porn Provision
The section of Canada's Criminal Code struck down yesterday by
the Supreme Court of British Columbia in R. v. Sharpe:
Section 163.4 -- Every person who possesses any child
pornography is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
|
|
|