"Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed
from a Natural Parent!!!
"Two Equal Parents may .. agree to unequal Parenting
Time, but this does NOT impugn the Parental Authority of either
Natural Parent relative to Third Party Interlopers.
1. The Bottom Layer: The Initial
Equal Parenting Agreement
Initial
Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time equality
of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a
Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of
tentative
Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or
"Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable
laid out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and
incorporated into the
Annual Parenting Supplement. Parental authority and
discretion is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of
Parenting Time allocations.
2. Middle Layer: The Annual
Supplement & its Parenting Timetable
3. Top Layer: Autonomy of Both Equal
Parents on all matters not previously Constrained.
Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions
between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no
third parties. Full autonomy of each parent during their
Parenting Time as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all
residual parenting questions not previously constrained by Covenants
in the initial Equal Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual
Parenting Supplement. Full discretion on residual parenting
with the Timetabled Parent, but flexibility encouraged and provided
by Ad Hoc Agreements.
"Trociuk
is .. a disheartening endorsement of biological concepts of
parenthood ... flawed .... it legitimizes a heterosexual view
of the family. .. It must be ignored."
This is a Judge practicing his sexual orientation
for decades while on the BC Bench. It is inconceivable that
the Law Enforcement officers and other Judges were unaware of all
his activities. Law Enforcement Officers, are of course unable
to act without the support of the Judiciary.
The university community tells us that at least
one of the Status of
Women university profs is not just
a run of the mill Communist... she's a self professed
MAOIST!!! The difference we're told is that a MAOIST
believes in
We say it is
Hedy Fry, and these
"Second Wave Feminists" /
Status of Women /
Women's Studies types that need to be eradicated from tax
funded positions and be forced to make Reparations to the thousands
of Fathers and their families whose lives who have been destroyed by
them since the sixties. We need also the restoration of the
Enticement &
Seduction provisions of Common Law which these SOWs had struck
by Statute.
...
No one would listen to my
father , no one would give him a chance to speak. ... My dad was an
abused husband, he was abused by his wife, and the justice system.
... He was a kind man who fought a good fight but no matter what he
did or said, he could never win with this system.
The common practice in BC Courts when Fathers do
not pay Child Support
- which most of the time is merely
Imputed - is to send
non-paying Father to Prison until he or his family members pay the
fees imposed by the Judge.
Even when mothers agree that Child Support should
no longer be paid, we find that the
Family Enforcement agencies, which are private contractors
functioning as
Bounty Hunters, typically refuse to end their claim on the
father's income,.
"Lohstroh, a 41-year-old
emergency-room doctor, was shot in the back Friday when he went to
pick up his two sons at their mother's home. Police say the
10-year-old boy climbed into the back of his father's sport utility
vehicle, fired a pistol several times through the back of the
driver's seat and then ran back inside the home."
Psychiatrist <Dr. David Craig> deemed MD's
risk as low
The family of a physician who committed
suicide in 2004 is suing the St. John's psychiatrist who
discharged her from hospital just hours before her death.
Days before her death, Marshall, a family
physician, made a call from the hospital to the staff at her
medical clinic. She asked them for a syringe and
lidocaine, a pain-deadening drug, which another physician at
the clinic recognized as "a suicide kit." That physician
instructed staff not to turn those items over to Marshall.
Court documents also say Marshall made what
family members described as "goodbye calls," which were reported
to Craig. She was assessed by a hospital psychologist, who
also reported to Craig that she was at significant risk for
suicide. Her family claims Craig ignored that
and other signs that she was suicidal.
Craig
deemed Marshall to be at low risk for suicide and discharged her
from hospital, without medication. Hours later,
Marshall ended her own life.
The claim argues that both Craig and
Eastern Health — the regional authority which manages the
Health Sciences Centre — were negligent.
It
also argues that Craig should have kept Marshall in hospital for
her own safety.
The claim seeks losses, including loss of income and support for
Marshall's young daughter. The suit also seeks damages as well
as the legal costs of this case.
In a statement of defense,
Craig said Marshall's treatment team agreed that her suicide
risk was low and that she should be discharged. He
also said Marshall displayed manipulative behavior and that he
took her off her medications in order to get a clear diagnosis
of her condition. Craig said Marshall's suicide came as a
complete shock to him.
FYI, We're told by a PhD Biochemist that Lawyers and Insurance
Companies over the last
couple of decades have
put
intense pressure on
Ontario Doctors that they owe their patients no "Duty
of Care". In recent years, Ontario Doctors have
accepted the will of the Insurance Companies and implemented
this into their Society.
Danny Williams and the real reasons for prosecution of
Ed Byrne by Karol Karolak, P.Eng. April 18, 2009
2009-04-18
Dear Danny,
I am quite sure that you would not want your friends and
enemies in Newfoundland and Labrador and the rest of Canada
remain in the dark about the real reasons for your
Anything But Conservative (ABC), campaign in 2008, nor should
you want them to remain ignorant about real reasons why you
decided to prosecute Ed Byrne, and many others politicians
in NL, nor should you want them to remain ignorant about
real reasons why you decided to use your goon Justice David
Orr to contact contract murderer Dr. David Craig to
eliminate Byron Prior at the psych ward of Waterford
Hospital.
Lets start with the timeline:
1.
Tom Marshall was elected NL legislature and appointment
to Cabinet in 2003 as a Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Newfoundland and Labrador. Now we know, that this appointment opened the door for
Dr. Mary-Anne Marshall to seek justice for sexual abuse at the
hands of Alex T.
Hickman. (Burin where she grew up and Grand
Banks where Priors grew up are very close geographically so
it is safe to assume that
Alex T. Hickman who was raping
Prior kids in Grand Banks was also "operating" in Burin.)
2. Dr. Mary-Anne Marshall died July 6, 2004, the same day
she was discharged from the Health Sciences Centre's
psychiatric unit in St. John's by Dr. David Craig, see:
2007-01-24 MD's family files suit over post-discharge
suicide. .
Now we know that Dr. Mary-Anne Marshall was killed thru
skilful application of "Zyprexa pump and dump" pseudo
medical procedure that is inducing suicides of intended
victims in what appears to have been a contract murder that
most likely was arranged by Alex T. Hickman and as we
already know was carried out by Dr. David Craig.
3. In September 2004, you Danny attend at First
Minister's Conference to Fix Healthcare for a Generation
(see: attachment and,
The Blogging Tories
and
2004-09-16 Anatomy of an agreement
that Paul Martin arranged in order to cover up mass murder
of the
Inuit of Baffin Island during so called "Canadian Zyprexa Experiment.
You Danny, knew that Paul Martin was up against the wall so
between September of 2004 and January of 2005 you have
cranked up Marshall family of Newfoundland in order for them
to make noise in Ottawa about Dr. Mary-Anne Marshall's
murder and scare Paul Martin so you could shake Paul Martin
down for 2.6 billion dollars in a deal that was signed in
late January of 2005 see
Danny Williams (politician)
4. Now we know that you never told Marshall family what
you were up to and what was the real deal that you wanted to
make with Paul Martin and as soon as you made your deal with
Martin you left Marshall family in a lurch and you back-pedaled
on criminal prosecution of Dr. David Craig for Dr.
Marshall's murder.
6. In April of 2006 Byron Prior went to Ottawa and
started to demonstrate in front of Canadian Parliament, see;
Testimonials: Byron Prior
7. In early May of 2006
Norman
Doyle Conservative MP from Newfoundland spoke to Byron
Prior, in front of Parliament Building, took his papers and
promised Byron that he will hand deliver them to the new
Minister of Justice
Vic Toews,
He came back to Byron later in a day to tell him that he
hand delivered these papers and left them on
Vic Toews'
desk.
8. On May 15, 2006
Byron Prior was approached by Tim
Marshall than sitting Minister of Justice for Newfoundland
and Labrador and four other men from Newfoundland and
Labrador Ministry of Justice. They encouraged Byron Prior to
keep up his fight for justice, see;
Tom Marshall. Now we know that Marshall family had their own score to
settle with Alex T. Hickman over the contract murder of
Dr. Mary-Anne Marshall. Now we also know that Tim Marshall who
met Byron Prior in Ottawa held a meeting with federal
officials in Justice department in Ottawa in May 2006
discussing not only Byron Prior's case but also contract
murder of Dr. Mary-Anne Marshall in 2004 most likely
arranged by Alex T. Hickman.
9. After
Tim Marshall
went back to St. John's he put a
lot of pressure on you Danny to have your "God Father" and
protector Alex T. Hickman prosecuted for abuse of Prior
family. Tim Marshall was in fact was a part of coalition
that formed to have you turfed out Danny. The fact that you
could not keep it in your pants and you seduced and now you
are sleeping with Loyola Sullivan's daughter whom you met
when she was going out with your own son helped Tim
Marshall's efforts to form that coalition.
10. You Danny, would not take this blatant attempt to
overthrow your reign of terror and corruption in
Newfooundland and Labrador without a fight so in June 2006,
you started a war in Newfoundland Legislature accusing Ed
Byrne and other politicians of corruption, and you forced Ed
Byrne out of your cabinet see;
2006-06-28 Byrne resignation rocks political circles
11. By December of 2006 you have
successfully managed to quell that rebellion when you forced
Ed Byrne and Loyola Sullivan to quit politics and you moved
Tim Marshall out of Minister of Justice portfolio into
finance. see: 2006-12-30-
Loyola Sullivan quits Newfoundland politics
14. Seening that you were outnumbered at NL legislature
you arranged that your buddy Jerome Kennedy would run for
elected office as well and after October 2007 elections, you
Danny, nominated your buddy from your old law firm Jerome
Kennedy, Q.C. as a Justice Minister to keep lid on things,
see;
http://www.pcparty.nf.net/jeromekennedy.htm
15. "ABC," (Anything But Conservative), campaign in 2008,
that you waged in fall of 2008 had nothing to with your
alleged dislike of Stephen Harper or his policies toward
Newfoundland and Labrador, it was a plain retaliation for
Norman Doyle starting a coup against you Danny in May 2006
that had to quelled by you by selectively exposing and
selectively prosecuting corruption of your political
opponents of all stripes. You knew that in case CPC gains a
majority they will retaliate against you. Your "ABC" effort
was successful enough that Harper never got the majority in
October 14, 2008 elections but Harper nevertheless scared
you by winning more seats than you expected so in order to
mend fences with Harper right after federal elections you
shuffled your cabinet on October 30, 2008 and you put Tim
Marshall back into Justice Minister position.
The sexual abuse
and family dynamics he reports while he and his siblings were abused are all too
familiar. The fact that the Authorities want to brush off the
reports of sexual abuse is all too familiar.
What is unusual about Byron,
is that he is
NOT willing to become complicent in his Perpetrator's deception. Byron insists on seeing the Authorities clean house. Unfortunately
for Byron and his Siblings, his family's abuser IS an Authority in Newfoundland.
We and most examiners of sexual abuse
find this to be shockingly common.
Very few Victims have the emotional stamina and moral strength to
overcome the impediments placed before them in taking a
Pedophile out of
Public Office. We hope you will lend him your support. If you have a
Sexual Abuse Recovery Group, we hope you will send us and Byron your
Greeting,
and invite us to send Victims of Sex Abuse to you when we find them. Byron
has been married for over twenty five years. The following is his
Personal Story.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they
will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges are
Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT has
the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only
observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly
Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws
and customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a view to aggregate
existing customs which may vary across the land, into a unified
body of Laws.
The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of
Common Law
were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took
only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC
body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for
"Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
