Testimonials Area Home
A Judge's Story Andrade, Franklin, Montreal Armstrong, Brian Bailey, Russell , RIP Brown, Arthur Carlin, Sara, RIP: Death by Anti-Depressant Cino, Sam Conway, Maurice Crockford Scott v RCMP Deadbeat Dad or Mum Dexel Mark Edward RIP Duplessis Orphans: Nazi Experiments England, Jonathan Vs Lesbian Lover Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel, NL Fleury , Theoren: Sexual Abuse Fredrickson, Rick RIP, Sask Gonis, Frank & Ashley Imputed Income Testimonials Jeffery, Hal & Danica Kempling, Dr. Chris Lohstroh, Rick, RIP: Mother Ass'd Patricide M Mabbot, Mel Manley, Perry, RIP: RIP: Suicide-by-Cop McLaughlin,Terry - RIP Millar, Wrongful Arrest Murtari, John Prejean, Carrie, Miss CA, "Tolerance... Prior, Byron: Sexual Abuse by Public Officer Renouf, Andy - RIP Samson, Pierre: Duplessis Orphans Sielski, Paul: Debtor’s Prison, Imputed Income Street, Wilbur - RIP Thornton: Womens' Threats Trociuk, Darrel - SCC White, Darren - RIP Wiebe, Ken v Status of Women Winkler, Matthew-RIP: Homicidal Moms Deadbeat Dad or Mum Fathers 4 Justice Fathers Thrown into Poverty MY LONG DISTANCE LIFE
|
Father
Suicide Directory








|
Hal
was a Widower and had a daughter, Danica, from a previous marriage.
He then had two children with a new wife who left him when they were
toddlers. (She was reported to have taken up with her Courtenay
lawyer.) When our BC Family Courts put Hal
through
it's torments of Imputed Income,
Gleaned Wages,
State Imposed Homelessness,
and
Debtor's Prison, they imposed these same torments on his
daughter Danica, then a Tween. Hal points out the Support Tables
assume the only children to support are the Payee's children.
You can see where that left Hal & Danica: homeless and
dependent on the kindnesses of neighbors.
More...
Imputed Income
Jeffery Hal's Testimonial;
Hall Jeffery's Danica Petition
|
"Desperate Husbands", by Stephen Perrine
2006-06-18 Keeping Divorced Dads at a Distance, Stephen
Perrine, Stephen Perrine, the editor in chief of
Best Life magazine, is
the author of the forthcoming "Desperate Husbands."(Thanks,
Paul Forseth)
EVERY other weekend for the past four and a half years, I've spent
three precious days with my two adolescent daughters. We play tennis
in summer, ski in winter, travel when the school schedule allows.
But no matter where we are, we're all keenly aware of the thin
membrane of secrecy that keeps us from being as close as we were
before their mom and I divorced. <Equal
Parenting eliminates this!!!>
Like most divorced fathers, I'm caught in
exactly the kind of nightmarish situation that experts on stress say
to avoid — a great deal of responsibility, but very little power.I'm
the major source of support for my children; my financial
obligations are set by the state, and my wages automatically
garnished. (If I lost my job tomorrow, and couldn't keep up with my
payments, a warrant for my arrest would be issued within two
months.) But my influence over how my daughters are being raised is
limited, sometimes by decisions their mother makes that I have no
input into, and sometimes by their allegiance to her when she and I
are at odds. ... They'll forget to tell me
some detail of their lives — or downright lie if they have to — so I
won't feel sad that I've missed something they shared with their
mom, or raise issue over some decision she's made with which I might
not agree. As a result, I sometimes come away from visits or phone
calls feeling shaken, saddened and angry. My ex and I
have been to court over support issues, and we've been to court over
custody issues, and the legal battles inevitably trap our children
in the middle and force them to choose sides. Sadly, this is exactly
what not to do if you want to foster a loving parent-child bond. In
a study by a child psychologist, ...
The first step toward fostering a father and child reunion is to
make private mediation of the parenting provisions (physical
custody, legal custody and visiting) the standard procedure.
Allowing parents the chance to negotiate their support — and
possibly give fathers more of a say in how their support is spent —
will decrease the vitriol, and let fathers feel more like parents,
not just paychecks.
Second, we need to enact and enforce
sensible penalties for interfering with visits. Jailing a mother
is no way to solve the dispute; neither are financial penalties
that hurt her ability to care for the child. But mediation —
perhaps compelled by the threat of financial penalty — might be
the solution. It's estimated that one in five children of
divorce has not seen his or her father in the past year. Without
substantial rethinking of our current support and custody law,
children will continue to be alienated from their fathers, and
lawyers will remain on hand to soak up the resulting legal fees.

Just this month, I received a summons to attend a custody
conference at the Allentown, Pa., courthouse, and another letter
informing me that an accounting error has left me short on
support payments, and that my passport may be suspended. I want
to shield my daughters from these harsh truths. So these are the
secrets I'll be trying to keep from them as we gather together
for Father's Day. What secrets will they be keeping from
me?
Stephen Perrine, the editor in chief of Best Life magazine, is
the author of the forthcoming "Desperate Husbands."
For more...
canadacourtwatch.com
|
| |
Darrell Trociuk: SCC affirms Father's Natural Parent's Rights
UVic's Hester Lessard insists Trociuk SCC decision must be
ignored - it "endorses the biological concept of parenthood" and
is trumped by Homosexual Rights.
Sister Judges Southin, Prouse &
Newbury of BC Supreme Court shrugs
off SCC, saying "Fathers have no rights"
|
|
2003-06-06
Supreme Court of Canada -
Decisions - Trociuk v.
British Columbia (Attorney
General)
Trociuk v. British Columbia
(Attorney General) -
Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia;
"Trociuk
v. British Columbia
(Attorney General),
[2003] 1 S.C.R. 835 is a
leading
Supreme Court of Canada
decision on
section 15(1) of the
Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms where a
father successfully
challenged a provision in
the British Columbia Vital
Statistics Act, which gave a
mother complete control over
the identity of the father
on a child's birth
certificate, on the basis
that it violated his
equality rights."
The Decision of
the Supreme Court of
Canada ....
"The
constitutional
questions are
answered as follows:
"Question 1:
Do ss. 3(1)(b) and
3(6)(b) of the
British Columbia
Vital Statistics
Act, R.S.B.C. 1996,
c. 479, on their own
or in their effect,
discriminate against
biological fathers
on the basis of sex,
by providing
biological mothers
with sole discretion
to include or
exclude information
relating to
biological fathers
when registering the
birth of a child,
contrary to s. 15(1)
of the Canadian
Charter of Rights
and Freedoms?"
"Answer:
Yes."
"Question 2:
If question 1 is
answered in the
affirmative, is the
discrimination a
reasonable limit
prescribed by law
which can be
demonstrably
justified in a free
and democratic
society under s. 1
of the Charter?"
"Answer:
No."
|
 |
Ian Mulgrew, Vancouver Sun,
Friday, November 14, 2003
Darrell Trociuk
sat like a coiled spring as he was described by a University of Victoria law
professor <Lessard> as "more than
a casual fornicator"
and
"less than a social parent."
(Darrell Trociuk was in a common law marriage of about three years when his
children were conceived.)
In June, the 38-year-old Delta dad won a
seven-year-long fight at the Supreme Court of Canada to have his name included
on the birth certificates for his triplet sons.
He's still waiting for the change and he's
angry that his case has since become a feminist cause celebre in which he is
often falsely portrayed.. On Thursday, he confronted professor Hester Lessard
after she had given a thoughtful 45-minute presentation at the University of
B.C. -- part of a regular lunch-time lecture series at the law school -- on why
she believed the unanimous verdict of the Supreme Court in his case was wrong.
She came to talk about family ideologies and the construction of parenthood in a
world where science says potentially five adults can be involved in a birth --
the two social parents (the couple who rear the child), a sperm donor, an egg
donor and a birth mother.
He came to complain that he was being
turned into fodder by the gender war.
Some scholars and lawyers,
<Lessard>
for instance, have suggested that in today's world of gay and lesbian families,
the high-court ruling in Trociuk is as flawed as the original statute.
A writer and teacher of feminist theory,
constitutional law and equality rights, Lessard is particularly critical
of the decision. Lessard believes Justice Marie Deschamps,
writing her first ruling, erred in her analysis and in the manner in which she
framed the issues.
She <Lessard> believes the decision
is
"a disheartening endorsement of biological concepts of parenthood",
"an
increasingly fictional creation narrative." "It legitimates a heterosexual
view of the family," she said.
Trociuk won because the Supreme Court
ruled B.C.'s Vital Statistics Act violated Canada's Charter of
Rights and Freedoms by discriminating against "fathers."
A section of the act provides mothers with
sole discretion to include or exclude information relating to fathers when
registering the birth of a child. A father who is not named on a birth
certificate has no say in the surname of his child. (Trociuk,
however, can't seek name changes for sons Ryan, Andrew and
Daniel, born on Jan. 29, 1996, until the province rewrites the act and the
government was given a year to fix it.) Trociuk was not married to Reni
Ernst, 44, who maintains that, as soon as the boys are old enough, she will
allow them to choose their names. The triplets were putatively conceived in a
last-ditch attempt to mend the tumultuous relationship. When the inevitable
split came, it was bitter. It remains caustic.
Trociuk began the fight to be acknowledged
as the father of the boys within six months of their birth. He has
visitation rights and pays some child support for his sons, who live in Nanaimo.
He lost the first round to be recognized in B.C. Supreme Court and lost again at
the B.C. Court of Appeal.
This summer, though,
Justice Deschamps disagreed with the
lower courts and said Trociuk was right.
It was a no-brainer in her view: Mothers and
fathers should be equal.
But in 2003, as
Lessard pointed out,
"Who constitutes the "mother" and the
"father"? ....This
is the crucial mis-step," <Lessard> said. "The debate should not be framed by
who is a 'mother' and who is a 'father.'"
"The high court's reasoning was flawed",
Lessard said, "and the justices should have been more on top of their
game."
Before
they ruled, the Vital Statistics Act should be fixed,
<Lessard>
said, a
B.C.
Human
Rights Tribunal
<chaired by career Homosexual Activist,
Mary Woo Simms> had
ordered it amended to accommodate gays and lesbians. The high
court should have spent time mulling the same concerns <of
the Homosexual Activist>.
In essence, what I heard her say is "the
law today should be gender-neutral and as reflective of real life as we can make
it.
The Trociuk decision is bad law because it perpetuates as
many Stereotypes <ie. that Parental Rights fall inherently to male and female
NATURAL PARENTS, Mothers & Fathers> as it purports to correct."
And I think she's right.
What about a dozen aggrieved fathers in the audience heard, unfortunately, was
that they were going to have to wait again while gay and lesbian parents were
accommodated. And a few of them got rude about it. "I can't
believe this crap," snapped one particular boor who dubbed the
law school a
"lesbian breeding
ground."
Listening to the theoretical ramifications
of his case, Trociuk didn't like what he heard either.
He has his own version of the story and it
isn't about stereotypes or about the interplay of private and public authority
in the family unit. It's about romance gone wrong and a father who doesn't get
enough time with his kids. "You are wrong," he told Lessard. "I
was all for a hyphenated name. She has played a
charade the whole way."
The professor was talking about public
policy and he was talking about pain. "I love my kids," he said. "I could be run
over by a bus today and there would be no recognition." Lessard had
no response and moved on to another question. But what could she say?
Trociuk won in the Supreme Court of Canada and it hasn't helped."
< In practical terms, Canadians are being governed instead by career
Homosexual
Activists like
Mary Woo Simms>.
Ian Mulgrew Vancouver Sun
|
|
COMMENT:
If
Justice Daphne Smith isn't a
Judge in
Criminal Breach of Trust, we'd
like to know what it takes for a BC
Judge to be CHARGED with
Breach?. Oh yeah, in
Prince George, at least, it's 25
years of sexual assault
while
on the BC Bench and the final
whistle blowing when a past victim
of the Judge sees her daughter about
to be sexually assaulted as she was
in her youth. We are calling
on the BC Attorney General to pull
Justice Daphne Smith off the BC
Bench immediately and file criminal
charges against her for
Criminal Breach of Trust
and in view of the Statutes she's
discarded and the
SCC decision addressing this
question specifically, charge
Daphne Smith also for
TREASON.
Madam
Justice Daphne Smith is
WRONG
to extrapolate into the
administration of the
Adoption Act the presently
UN-Constitutional, illegal practice
in BC Birth Certificate
registrations of permitting BC
Female Parents to declare the BC
Male Parents
"UNACKNOWLEDGED by the
Mother".
At
the stroke of a Mother's pen, any
and all Parental Rights of a Father
may be expunged in British Columbia.
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC)
has called this Decision a
"no-brainer", ruling in the
Trociuk v. British Columbia
(Attorney General) that
BC's Registration of Live Births
Form is a violation of a Natural
Father's Charter Rights. One
would expect the practice to be
STOPPED immediately following the
SCC's Order. It didn't.

Instead
the
Form was amended invite the
Mother to appoint anyone she pleases
as a
Co-Parent. A likely factor was
UVic's Homosexualist professor
Hester Lessard's campaign
following the SCC decision arguing
that
Trociuk v. British Columbia
(Attorney General) must be
ignored because it militates against
Homosexual Rights,
"affirms
arcane ideas that biology
constitutes parenthood",
and (horror of horrors!) legitimizes
a disgusting
"heterosexual
view of the Family".
 The
Co-Parent of course doesn't have
to pay Child Support or pay the
Mortgage on the home they have just
moved into with "Mom". That is
the role of the Natural Father or
any man the mother can get sexually
involved with for a period of six
months or more. (Take Warning,
guys!!) This later addition is
thanks to a modification of the
Family Relations Act by the
BC NDP trying to deal with the
debilitating cost of Welfare and
Low-Income housing for Single
Mothers on the BC economy.
Equal Parenting would have been
THE solution for that problem too,
but NDP would never affirm a
Father's Rights, now would they.
(So far the BC Liberals are no
better.)
In the end, BC Courts and government
agencies have made BC women their
Hookers, and continue to act as
their Pimps .
See also
Abortion Veto for Dads;
Adoption Veto for Dads;
OptionsBC.com

|
2004-11-01 Talking Point: Father seeks compensation for surname game,
Unbalanced, biased legal system hurts the children the most: LTE-Province
2004-10-29 Dad files $6.3M B.C. birth certificate lawsuit
2004-10-28 B.C. government refuses comment on father's birth certificate
law suit
2004-10-28 Dad <Darrel Trociuk> sues gov't for $6.3m in case of
'discrimination'; Father claims B.C. 'negligent' for not putting his surname on
his triplets' birth certificates
2004-xx-xx BC Ammendent - BILL 43 - VITAL STATISTICS AMENDMENT
ACT, 2004
2004-06-16 Gays, lesbians and the numbers game (1.0% Canadians
gay, 0.7% Bi)
2003-11-13 Going Statistical Mothers, Fathers, and Trociuk v. British
Columbia - UBC Faculty of Law
2003-11-13 Hester Lessard - November 13, 2003, UBC's CFLS Lecture Series
Fall 2003 (Lessard's Talk as Advertised);
Responses to UVic's
Hester Lessard
2003-11-03 Dad's case now a feminist cause celebre <UVic's law professor
Hester Lessard on Trociuk>: SCC decision is "flawed ... it
legitimates a heterosexual view of the family,"
2003-06-07 First ruling for male equality, Trociuk
2003-06-06
Supreme Court of Canada decision: -
Citation: Trociuk v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [2003] 1 S.C.R.
835, 2003
2003-06-03 Betty Hinton's letter to Jean Augustine,
Secretary of State, Status Of Women
2002-06-21-NP: Ontario court gives mother sole power on child
surname
2000-06-03: Feminists' culture of victimhood coming back to haunt them
Surrogacy: Dad's case now a feminist cause celebre
LEGAL, ETHICAL AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES AND WOMEN'S HEALTH IN CANADA
Law profs to speak on human rights and family conflict
http://as01.ucis.dal.ca/law/law_3457_1499.html
Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies
|
Darrell Trociuk: SCC affirms Father's Natural Parent's Rights
![]()

Google:
Trociuk, Darrell;
Darrel Trociuk won his Canada Supreme Court action
that Fathers and Mothers have Equal Rights. But University of Victoria Law Faculty
says Trociuk decision should be cast off because it intrudes on Homosexual
Rights. BCSC then cast off SCC decision, saying
"Fathers have NO RIGHTS" ...
Trociuk Pages: Fathers.ca

|
Mary Woo Simms, Chief Commissioner of BCHRT a
"motorcycle-riding lesbian"

mary woo sims - Google Search
2006-01-19
The Straight slate - Port Moody–Westwood–Port Coquitlam, Mary Woo
Siims, Straight.com;
"Mary Woo Sims, the former chief commissioner of the
BC Human Rights Commission,
is a hero to some in the gay and lesbian community for her record as
a defender and promoter of human rights.
Sims, a motorcycle-riding lesbian, lost a bid last year to
get elected to Coquitlam city council",
Georgia Straight

BykeDykes -- for
Dykes on Bikes and other motorcyclin' mamas.
More: News: Simms, Mary
Woo: BC HRT Chief;
News: BC Human Rights
Tribunal;
Issues:
Levant, Ezra: Freedom of Speech
|
|
|
|
![]()
|
|